Evaluating the explanatory power of the Conscious Turing Machine

The recent "Conscious Turing Machine" (CTM) proposal offered by Manuel and Lenore Blum aims to define and explore consciousness, contribute to the solution of the hard problem, and demonstrate the value of theoretical computer science with respect to the study of consciousness. Surprisingly, given the ambitiousness and novelty of the proposal (and the prominence of its creators), CTM has received relatively little attention. We here seek to remedy this by offering an exhaustive evaluation of CTM. Our evaluation considers the explanatory power of CTM in three different domains of interdisciplinary consciousness studies: the philosophy of mind, cognitive neuroscience, and computation. Based on our evaluation in each of the target domains, at present, any claim that CTM constitutes progress is premature. Nevertheless, the model has potential, and we highlight several possible avenues of future research which proponents of the model may pursue in its development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consciousness and Cognition
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2024.103736
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the explanatory power of the Conscious Turing Machine

Jakob Stenseke, Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup, Morten Overgaard
1 citations
Consciousness and Cognition
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
0.36
article

Evaluating the explanatory power of the Conscious Turing Machine

Jakob Stenseke, Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup, Morten Overgaard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The recent "Conscious Turing Machine" (CTM) proposal offered by Manuel and Lenore Blum aims to define and explore consciousness, contribute to the solution of the hard problem, and demonstrate the value of theoretical computer science with respect to the study of consciousness. Surprisingly, given the ambitiousness and novelty of the proposal (and the prominence of its creators), CTM has received relatively little attention. We here seek to remedy this by offering an exhaustive evaluation of CTM. Our evaluation considers the explanatory power of CTM in three different domains of interdisciplinary consciousness studies: the philosophy of mind, cognitive neuroscience, and computation. Based on our evaluation in each of the target domains, at present, any claim that CTM constitutes progress is premature. Nevertheless, the model has potential, and we highlight several possible avenues of future research which proponents of the model may pursue in its development.

Consciousness and CognitionVol. 124
Lund University (SE), Aarhus University (DK)
Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the explanatory power of the Conscious Turing Machine — Jakob Stenseke, Asger Kirkeby-Hinrup, et al. · Consciousness and Cognition (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS