Support services for informal carers: a register-based case–control study of Norwegian care recipients

This article aims to describe support services for informal carers and identify the characteristics of the care recipient and municipality that are associated with the allocation of these services. Care recipients were selected from the Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care on 31 December 2019. Cases received care benefits ( N = 9,816), respite care in institutions ( N = 2,594) or respite care at home ( N = 7,346); controls received home-based services only ( N = 193,402). Municipal data were retrieved from the Municipality-State-Reporting register. Child and adolescent care recipients most often received support services, but allocation to this age group differed extensively between municipalities. Greater cognitive disability and cohabiting increased the odds of support services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Care and Caring
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/23978821y2024d000000071
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Support services for informal carers: a register-based case–control study of Norwegian care recipients

Maren Sogstad, Lisa Victoria Burrell, Tore Wentzel‐Larsen
1 citations
International Journal of Care and Caring
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
1.13
article

Support services for informal carers: a register-based case–control study of Norwegian care recipients

Maren Sogstad, Lisa Victoria Burrell, Tore Wentzel‐Larsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article aims to describe support services for informal carers and identify the characteristics of the care recipient and municipality that are associated with the allocation of these services. Care recipients were selected from the Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care on 31 December 2019. Cases received care benefits ( N = 9,816), respite care in institutions ( N = 2,594) or respite care at home ( N = 7,346); controls received home-based services only ( N = 193,402). Municipal data were retrieved from the Municipality-State-Reporting register. Child and adolescent care recipients most often received support services, but allocation to this age group differed extensively between municipalities. Greater cognitive disability and cohabiting increased the odds of support services.

International Journal of Care and Caring
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Support services for informal carers: a register-based case–control study of Norwegian care recipients — Maren Sogstad, Lisa Victoria Burrell, et al. · International Journal of Care and Caring (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS