The ‘service user’ label through critical constructivist lenses

Mindful of the risk of seeming to cover ‘old ground’, this article strives to open new ground, or make old ground fresh again, by regarding the ‘service user’ label through critical constructivist lenses. Specifically, this article seeks to demonstrate how the agentive, self-determining qualities attached to ‘service users’, as opposed to ‘clients’ or ‘customers’, are complicated by more pejorative connotations ascribed to the term in everyday, social work and neoliberal discourses while highlighting how words matter. Not only do tensions between and within discourses register and generate tensions in practice, but, especially, language also constitutes social reality and the people and things making it up. Although frightening, yet inescapably ‘normal’, instances of structural violence and harsh austerity measures must be regarded in the context of discourse, albeit while not being determined by it, questioning common-sense discourses and the practices they index may produce possibilities for creating alternate languages and practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical and Radical Social Work
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/20498608y2024d000000047
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘service user’ label through critical constructivist lenses

Alex Cockain
Critical and Radical Social Work
Social Media and Politics
article

The ‘service user’ label through critical constructivist lenses

Alex Cockain
article en

Abstract

Mindful of the risk of seeming to cover ‘old ground’, this article strives to open new ground, or make old ground fresh again, by regarding the ‘service user’ label through critical constructivist lenses. Specifically, this article seeks to demonstrate how the agentive, self-determining qualities attached to ‘service users’, as opposed to ‘clients’ or ‘customers’, are complicated by more pejorative connotations ascribed to the term in everyday, social work and neoliberal discourses while highlighting how words matter. Not only do tensions between and within discourses register and generate tensions in practice, but, especially, language also constitutes social reality and the people and things making it up. Although frightening, yet inescapably ‘normal’, instances of structural violence and harsh austerity measures must be regarded in the context of discourse, albeit while not being determined by it, questioning common-sense discourses and the practices they index may produce possibilities for creating alternate languages and practices.

Critical and Radical Social WorkVol. 13(3)
Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.