Interplay between depth and width for interpolation in neural ODEs

Neural ordinary differential equations have emerged as a natural tool for supervised learning from a control perspective, yet a complete understanding of the role played by their architecture remains elusive. In this work, we examine the interplay between the width p and the number of transitions between layers L (corresponding to a depth of L+1). Specifically, we construct explicit controls interpolating either a finite dataset D, comprising N pairs of points in R<sup>d</sup>, or two probability measures within a Wasserstein error margin ɛ>0. Our findings reveal a balancing trade-off between p and L, with L scaling as 1+O(N/p) for data interpolation, and as 1+Op<sup>-1</sup>+(1+p)<sup>-1</sup>ɛ<sup>-d</sup> for measures. In the high-dimensional and wide setting where d,p>N, our result can be refined to achieve L=0. This naturally raises the problem of data interpolation in the autonomous regime, characterized by L=0. We adopt two alternative approaches: either controlling in a probabilistic sense, or by relaxing the target condition. In the first case, when p=N we develop an inductive control strategy based on a separability assumption whose probability increases with d. In the second one, we establish an explicit error decay rate with respect to p which results from applying a universal approximation theorem to a custom-built Lipschitz vector field interpolating D.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neural Networks
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106640
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interplay between depth and width for interpolation in neural ODEs

Arselane Hadj Slimane, Enrique Zuazua, Antonio Álvarez-López
9 citations
Neural Networks
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
2.53
article

Interplay between depth and width for interpolation in neural ODEs

Arselane Hadj Slimane, Enrique Zuazua, Antonio Álvarez-López
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Neural ordinary differential equations have emerged as a natural tool for supervised learning from a control perspective, yet a complete understanding of the role played by their architecture remains elusive. In this work, we examine the interplay between the width p and the number of transitions between layers L (corresponding to a depth of L+1). Specifically, we construct explicit controls interpolating either a finite dataset D, comprising N pairs of points in R<sup>d</sup>, or two probability measures within a Wasserstein error margin ɛ>0. Our findings reveal a balancing trade-off between p and L, with L scaling as 1+O(N/p) for data interpolation, and as 1+Op<sup>-1</sup>+(1+p)<sup>-1</sup>ɛ<sup>-d</sup> for measures. In the high-dimensional and wide setting where d,p>N, our result can be refined to achieve L=0. This naturally raises the problem of data interpolation in the autonomous regime, characterized by L=0. We adopt two alternative approaches: either controlling in a probabilistic sense, or by relaxing the target condition. In the first case, when p=N we develop an inductive control strategy based on a separability assumption whose probability increases with d. In the second one, we establish an explicit error decay rate with respect to p which results from applying a universal approximation theorem to a custom-built Lipschitz vector field interpolating D.

Neural NetworksVol. 180
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Comunidad de Madrid, European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Université Paris-Saclay, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
2.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.