Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation practice patterns: A survey study of the International Pain and Spine Interventional Society

The study provides valuable insights into the current practice patterns of GnRFA among interventional pain physicians. While there is consensus on some aspects of patient selection and procedural techniques, significant variability exists in prognostic block protocols and nerve targets for GnRFA. These findings highlight the need for further research to explore the long-term efficacy and safety of GnRFA and to standardize techniques and protocols across different practice settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. The low response rate may limit generalizability, and the survey did not include data on active tip sizes used for ablation or whether other procedures should be exhausted before resorting to GnRFA. Additionally, a survey to IPSIS membership only may not fully represent a diverse cohort of pain management specialists, potentially introducing sampling bias. Future studies should include members from a broader range of professional organizations to enhance representativeness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Pain Medicine
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100432
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation practice patterns: A survey study of the International Pain and Spine Interventional Society

Reza Ehsanian, Rohit Aiyer, Taylor Burnham, Aaron Conger et al.
6 citations
Interventional Pain Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
3.44
article

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation practice patterns: A survey study of the International Pain and Spine Interventional Society

Reza Ehsanian, Rohit Aiyer, Taylor Burnham, Aaron Conger, Zachary L. McCormick, Shawn Fernandez, Daniel M. Cushman, Alexandra E. Fogarty, Amanda Cooper, Katie Smolinski
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The study provides valuable insights into the current practice patterns of GnRFA among interventional pain physicians. While there is consensus on some aspects of patient selection and procedural techniques, significant variability exists in prognostic block protocols and nerve targets for GnRFA. These findings highlight the need for further research to explore the long-term efficacy and safety of GnRFA and to standardize techniques and protocols across different practice settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. The low response rate may limit generalizability, and the survey did not include data on active tip sizes used for ablation or whether other procedures should be exhausted before resorting to GnRFA. Additionally, a survey to IPSIS membership only may not fully represent a diverse cohort of pain management specialists, potentially introducing sampling bias. Future studies should include members from a broader range of professional organizations to enhance representativeness.

Interventional Pain MedicineVol. 3(3)
University of New Mexico (US), University of Utah (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Pain Management Institute (US), Center for Pain and the Brain (US)
University of Utah
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.