New Directions for Theories for Why Employees Stay or Leave

We critically review classic and contemporary theory and research on employee turnover and retention and frame a future research agenda that generates new directions for these theories. We first review first- and second-generation turnover models that shaped conventional understanding of why employees voluntarily quit, classifying reasons as representing perceived desirability of movement or ease of movement. We next review the more contemporary unfolding model and its derivatives (i.e., shocks research, leader-departure effect, turnover event theory) that upended traditional explanations of how and why employees quit. After reviewing classic and contemporary turnover models, we shift our focus to job embeddedness, which over the past 20-plus years has taught us a great deal about why employees stay. We synthesize original job embeddedness research before appraising its extensions and recent developments. We conclude with a discussion of how organizations can cultivate the “right” kind of staying.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-033733
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Directions for Theories for Why Employees Stay or Leave

Kohyar Kiazad, Peter W. Hom
9 citations
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Employment and Welfare Studies
7.64
article

New Directions for Theories for Why Employees Stay or Leave

Kohyar Kiazad, Peter W. Hom
article en
9 citations

Abstract

We critically review classic and contemporary theory and research on employee turnover and retention and frame a future research agenda that generates new directions for these theories. We first review first- and second-generation turnover models that shaped conventional understanding of why employees voluntarily quit, classifying reasons as representing perceived desirability of movement or ease of movement. We next review the more contemporary unfolding model and its derivatives (i.e., shocks research, leader-departure effect, turnover event theory) that upended traditional explanations of how and why employees quit. After reviewing classic and contemporary turnover models, we shift our focus to job embeddedness, which over the past 20-plus years has taught us a great deal about why employees stay. We synthesize original job embeddedness research before appraising its extensions and recent developments. We conclude with a discussion of how organizations can cultivate the “right” kind of staying.

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational BehaviorVol. 12(1)
Arizona State University (US), Monash University (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Employment and Welfare Studies
7.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

New Directions for Theories for Why Employees Stay or Leave — Kohyar Kiazad, Peter W. Hom · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS