Considering Power and Institutional Change in the Study of Migration’s Impact on Non‐Migrants: Commentary on Schut & Crul (2024) and Keskiner et al. (2024)

Schut and Crul (2024) and Keskiner et al. (2024) bring much‐needed attention to migration’s impact on host societies. They investigate Dutch non‐migrant parents’ responses to migration‐related issues that arise in their children’s schooling, highlighting the diversity of those responses. Future analyses should move beyond individual analyses to understand broader social changes, how group‐level status shapes institutional responses to migration, and the role that systemic racism or Islamophobia may play in shaping individual and institutional responses to migration. This requires empirical analyses that incorporate participant observation in specific institutions (for example, schools), and attention to organizational decision‐making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Inclusion
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.9203
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering Power and Institutional Change in the Study of Migration’s Impact on Non‐Migrants: Commentary on Schut & Crul (2024) and Keskiner et al. (2024)

Natasha Warikoo
1 citations
Social Inclusion
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
1.13
article

Considering Power and Institutional Change in the Study of Migration’s Impact on Non‐Migrants: Commentary on Schut & Crul (2024) and Keskiner et al. (2024)

Natasha Warikoo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Schut and Crul (2024) and Keskiner et al. (2024) bring much‐needed attention to migration’s impact on host societies. They investigate Dutch non‐migrant parents’ responses to migration‐related issues that arise in their children’s schooling, highlighting the diversity of those responses. Future analyses should move beyond individual analyses to understand broader social changes, how group‐level status shapes institutional responses to migration, and the role that systemic racism or Islamophobia may play in shaping individual and institutional responses to migration. This requires empirical analyses that incorporate participant observation in specific institutions (for example, schools), and attention to organizational decision‐making.

Social InclusionVol. 12
Tufts University (US), McGill University (CA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.