Lessons for cannabinoid regulation from electronic nicotine delivery system product regulation

Cannabis legalization continues to spread, with 38 states permitting the use of medical marijuana, 22 states permitting recreational use, and growing political momentum for federal legalization. The last time the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was tasked with regulating a new product occurred with 2009's Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which created the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP). Thus, the time is ripe to review the history of CTP with particular attention to difficulties the nascent center faced in regulating novel products such as e-cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). Specifically, FDA has struggled with defining its scope of authority, determining which review pathway(s) to utilize, and promulgating timely and transparent product standards for marketing authorization-all of which offer lessons for improving cannabis product oversight and enforcement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae101
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons for cannabinoid regulation from electronic nicotine delivery system product regulation

Paul J. Larkin, Stan Veuger, Brian Yagi, Brian J. Miller
Health Affairs Scholar
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Lessons for cannabinoid regulation from electronic nicotine delivery system product regulation

Paul J. Larkin, Stan Veuger, Brian Yagi, Brian J. Miller
article en

Abstract

Cannabis legalization continues to spread, with 38 states permitting the use of medical marijuana, 22 states permitting recreational use, and growing political momentum for federal legalization. The last time the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was tasked with regulating a new product occurred with 2009's Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which created the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP). Thus, the time is ripe to review the history of CTP with particular attention to difficulties the nascent center faced in regulating novel products such as e-cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). Specifically, FDA has struggled with defining its scope of authority, determining which review pathway(s) to utilize, and promulgating timely and transparent product standards for marketing authorization-all of which offer lessons for improving cannabis product oversight and enforcement.

Health Affairs ScholarVol. 2(8)
Heritage Foundation (US), American Enterprise Institute (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Michigan (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Michigan Medicine (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Ohio State University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lessons for cannabinoid regulation from electronic nicotine delivery system product regulation — Paul J. Larkin, Stan Veuger, et al. · Health Affairs Scholar (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS