CT radiomics-based machine learning model for differentiating between enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma

It may be difficult to distinguish between enchondroma and low-grade malignant cartilage tumors (grade 1) radiologically. This study aimed to construct machine learning models using 3D computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics analysis to differentiate low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma. A total of 30 patients with enchondroma and 26 with chondrosarcoma were included in this retrospective study. Tumor volume segmentation was manually performed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists. In total, 107 radiomic features were obtained for each patient. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess interobserver reliability and estimate the absolute agreement between the 2 radiologists. Algorithm-based information gain was used as a feature reduction method, and the 5 most important features were detected. For classification, 7 machine learning models were utilized. Classification was carried out using either all features or 5 features. There was good to excellent agreement between the 2 radiologists for the 107 features of each patient. Therefore, a dataset containing 107 features was used for machine learning classification. When assessed based on area under curve (AUC) values, classification using all features revealed that naive Bayes was the best model (AUC = 0.950), while classification using 5 features revealed that random forest was the best model for differentiating chondrosarcoma from enchondroma (AUC = 0.967). In conclusion, machine learning models using CT-based radiomics analysis can be used to differentiate between low-grade chondrosarcoma and enchondroma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000039311
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CT radiomics-based machine learning model for differentiating between enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma

Mustafa Yı́ldı́rı́m, Hanefi Yıldırım
10 citations
Medicine
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
4.70
article

CT radiomics-based machine learning model for differentiating between enchondroma and low-grade chondrosarcoma

Mustafa Yı́ldı́rı́m, Hanefi Yıldırım
article en
10 citations

Abstract

It may be difficult to distinguish between enchondroma and low-grade malignant cartilage tumors (grade 1) radiologically. This study aimed to construct machine learning models using 3D computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics analysis to differentiate low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma. A total of 30 patients with enchondroma and 26 with chondrosarcoma were included in this retrospective study. Tumor volume segmentation was manually performed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists. In total, 107 radiomic features were obtained for each patient. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess interobserver reliability and estimate the absolute agreement between the 2 radiologists. Algorithm-based information gain was used as a feature reduction method, and the 5 most important features were detected. For classification, 7 machine learning models were utilized. Classification was carried out using either all features or 5 features. There was good to excellent agreement between the 2 radiologists for the 107 features of each patient. Therefore, a dataset containing 107 features was used for machine learning classification. When assessed based on area under curve (AUC) values, classification using all features revealed that naive Bayes was the best model (AUC = 0.950), while classification using 5 features revealed that random forest was the best model for differentiating chondrosarcoma from enchondroma (AUC = 0.967). In conclusion, machine learning models using CT-based radiomics analysis can be used to differentiate between low-grade chondrosarcoma and enchondroma.

MedicineVol. 103(33)
Fırat University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
4.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.