Kemampuan Berpikir Analogis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika

This study aims to describe students' analogical thinking abilities in solving mathematical problems. The subjects of this study were one fieldindependent cognitive-style student and one junior high school student from class VII.. The instruments used are analogical thinking ability test, and interview . The results of this study show that students in the coding stage did not write down the information in the questions on their answer sheets, however, they were able to explain during interviews. In the conclusion stage, students use methods that they consider easy and have used these methods before. In the mapping stage, students can identify the relationship between the source problem and the target problem during the interview, which can be seen from the similarity of the information known and asked. In the application stage students get conclusions from the solution to the source problem and target problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MATHEdunesa
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v13n2.p630-640
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kemampuan Berpikir Analogis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika

Pradnyo Wijayanti, Naili Fauziyah Elgiyan
MATHEdunesa
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Kemampuan Berpikir Analogis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika

Pradnyo Wijayanti, Naili Fauziyah Elgiyan
article en

Abstract

This study aims to describe students' analogical thinking abilities in solving mathematical problems. The subjects of this study were one fieldindependent cognitive-style student and one junior high school student from class VII.. The instruments used are analogical thinking ability test, and interview . The results of this study show that students in the coding stage did not write down the information in the questions on their answer sheets, however, they were able to explain during interviews. In the conclusion stage, students use methods that they consider easy and have used these methods before. In the mapping stage, students can identify the relationship between the source problem and the target problem during the interview, which can be seen from the similarity of the information known and asked. In the application stage students get conclusions from the solution to the source problem and target problem.

MATHEdunesaVol. 13(2)
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.