Self-fit vs audiologist-fit hearing aids

The author believes that the optimum choice for patients with hearing loss is not the patient pursuing his/her own “do-it-yourself” diagnosis and self-selected treatment option, but rather pursue the audiologist-driven patient-centered approach using the long-held traditional “diagnosis first, treatment second” approach currently used in medicine and healthcare. In a recent research study to determine if significant differences would emerge using these two approaches in the provision of hearing aids, De Sousa, et al.,1 reported equivalent outcomes between hearing aids fit by audiologists, when compared to self-fit Over the Counter (OTC) hearing aids. In their article, the authors provided numerous caveats to help explain the findings. Numerous “traditional” hearing aids can be successfully fit to every appropriate patient depending on factors as etiology; type, magnitude and configuration of hearing loss; desired improvement in aided signal-to-noise ratio; expertise of the provider regarding implementing best practices to address the goals of the patient. To the author, the most significant factor is the expertise (i.e., diagnosis, consultation, recommendation, selection, programming, verification, and validation services) of the provider.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15406/joentr.2024.16.00549
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-fit vs audiologist-fit hearing aids

Douglas L Beck Au. D
Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Self-fit vs audiologist-fit hearing aids

Douglas L Beck Au. D
article en

Abstract

The author believes that the optimum choice for patients with hearing loss is not the patient pursuing his/her own “do-it-yourself” diagnosis and self-selected treatment option, but rather pursue the audiologist-driven patient-centered approach using the long-held traditional “diagnosis first, treatment second” approach currently used in medicine and healthcare. In a recent research study to determine if significant differences would emerge using these two approaches in the provision of hearing aids, De Sousa, et al.,1 reported equivalent outcomes between hearing aids fit by audiologists, when compared to self-fit Over the Counter (OTC) hearing aids. In their article, the authors provided numerous caveats to help explain the findings. Numerous “traditional” hearing aids can be successfully fit to every appropriate patient depending on factors as etiology; type, magnitude and configuration of hearing loss; desired improvement in aided signal-to-noise ratio; expertise of the provider regarding implementing best practices to address the goals of the patient. To the author, the most significant factor is the expertise (i.e., diagnosis, consultation, recommendation, selection, programming, verification, and validation services) of the provider.

Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT ResearchVol. 16(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.