Comparison and Prospect of Chinese College Admission System and UCAS by Market Design Theory

This essay provides a depth analysis of the evolution of college admission mechanisms in China, focusing on the transition from the traditional 'non-parallel' system to the contemporary 'parallel' approach. It examines the characteristics and implications of both the old Sequential Mechanism and the new parallel mechanism, shedding light on their respective impacts on students and institutions. Furthermore, the essay explores the UCAS (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) system, offering a comparative analysis between the Chinese admission system and UCAS. By highlighting similarities, differences, advantages, and challenges, it aims to claim the diverse methodologies employed in university admissions worldwide. The essay also emphasizes the importance of adopting a multifaceted approach to enhance the efficacy and fairness of both the Chinese admission system and UCAS. It advocates for the incorporation of more comprehensive methods, increased transparency, and targeted support for disadvantaged students to promote equity and inclusive in college admissions. Moreover, its emphasis the significance of global collaboration and exchange of best practices in shaping a more inclusive and effective higher education landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/fp8bk692
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and Prospect of Chinese College Admission System and UCAS by Market Design Theory

Jiayun Xie
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Comparison and Prospect of Chinese College Admission System and UCAS by Market Design Theory

Jiayun Xie
article en

Abstract

This essay provides a depth analysis of the evolution of college admission mechanisms in China, focusing on the transition from the traditional 'non-parallel' system to the contemporary 'parallel' approach. It examines the characteristics and implications of both the old Sequential Mechanism and the new parallel mechanism, shedding light on their respective impacts on students and institutions. Furthermore, the essay explores the UCAS (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service) system, offering a comparative analysis between the Chinese admission system and UCAS. By highlighting similarities, differences, advantages, and challenges, it aims to claim the diverse methodologies employed in university admissions worldwide. The essay also emphasizes the importance of adopting a multifaceted approach to enhance the efficacy and fairness of both the Chinese admission system and UCAS. It advocates for the incorporation of more comprehensive methods, increased transparency, and targeted support for disadvantaged students to promote equity and inclusive in college admissions. Moreover, its emphasis the significance of global collaboration and exchange of best practices in shaping a more inclusive and effective higher education landscape.

Highlights in Business Economics and ManagementVol. 39
Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University (CN), Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Beijing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison and Prospect of Chinese College Admission System and UCAS by Market Design Theory — Jiayun Xie · Highlights in Business Economics and Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS