The Research On The Ownership Of Copyright Of AI-generated Content

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has significantly enriched society by producing a wide range of high-quality cultural products, offering aesthetic experiences comparable to traditional creations. However, the issue of ownership in legal practice remains ambiguous due to the involvement of multiple creators in the production process. To address this, the copyright granting process can be divided into initial authorization and subsequent rights transfer to delineate the rights of various parties involved. Current theories suggest that the commissioned works model effectively safeguards the interests of all parties by granting initial authorization to the hardware owner of the artificial intelligence while protecting the rights of the AI user through contracts. Moreover, lawmakers should enhance the current copyright law system, emphasize the importance of human involvement in generative artificial intelligence outputs, and establish collaborative mechanisms at the societal level to balance the interests of all parties involved. This approach will provide clarity and fairness in the ownership and distribution of rights associated with AI-generated products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/wxs9vv67
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Research On The Ownership Of Copyright Of AI-generated Content

Zhe Pan, Shutong Wang, Chenglin Zhang
4 citations
Highlights in Business Economics and Management
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
1.39
article

The Research On The Ownership Of Copyright Of AI-generated Content

Zhe Pan, Shutong Wang, Chenglin Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has significantly enriched society by producing a wide range of high-quality cultural products, offering aesthetic experiences comparable to traditional creations. However, the issue of ownership in legal practice remains ambiguous due to the involvement of multiple creators in the production process. To address this, the copyright granting process can be divided into initial authorization and subsequent rights transfer to delineate the rights of various parties involved. Current theories suggest that the commissioned works model effectively safeguards the interests of all parties by granting initial authorization to the hardware owner of the artificial intelligence while protecting the rights of the AI user through contracts. Moreover, lawmakers should enhance the current copyright law system, emphasize the importance of human involvement in generative artificial intelligence outputs, and establish collaborative mechanisms at the societal level to balance the interests of all parties involved. This approach will provide clarity and fairness in the ownership and distribution of rights associated with AI-generated products.

Highlights in Business Economics and ManagementVol. 39
Shanghai University of Political Science and Law (CN), Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics (CN), Inner Mongolia University of Technology (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.