PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA DENGAN HUKUM ISLAM DI ARAB SAUDI TENTANG PIDANA MATI

Southeast Asian nation of Indonesia enacted a Civil Law legal system heavily inspired by Western law. While Saudi Arabia, which upholds Islamic law, based its rules directly on the Qur'an and Hadith, both of which support the death sentence, the Indonesian legal system bases its laws primarily on legislation. The goal of this study is to determine the parallels and differences between the death penalty's application in Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, as well as the elements that make these two countries' applications distinct from one another. Normative legal research is the kind of research employed in this investigation. The historical and comparative approaches that were employed in this study are historical and comparative approaches, respectively. The study's conclusions indicate that Saudi Arabia and Indonesia apply the death sentence in quite comparable ways. In spite of this, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia employ rather different criteria when deciding whether to execute someone. Historical elements contribute to both Saudi Arabia's and Indonesia's criminal law systems' similarities and variances. While Indonesia employs a Civil Law legal system, which makes legislation the primary source of law, Saudi Arabia implements an Islamic legal system based on the Qur'an and Hadith.Keywords: Death penalty, Qhisas and Comparison Of Legal Systems

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ensiklopedia Education Review
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v6i1.2570
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA DENGAN HUKUM ISLAM DI ARAB SAUDI TENTANG PIDANA MATI

Ihsan Busri, Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom
Ensiklopedia Education Review
Legal Studies and Policies
article

PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA DENGAN HUKUM ISLAM DI ARAB SAUDI TENTANG PIDANA MATI

Ihsan Busri, Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom
article en

Abstract

Southeast Asian nation of Indonesia enacted a Civil Law legal system heavily inspired by Western law. While Saudi Arabia, which upholds Islamic law, based its rules directly on the Qur'an and Hadith, both of which support the death sentence, the Indonesian legal system bases its laws primarily on legislation. The goal of this study is to determine the parallels and differences between the death penalty's application in Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, as well as the elements that make these two countries' applications distinct from one another. Normative legal research is the kind of research employed in this investigation. The historical and comparative approaches that were employed in this study are historical and comparative approaches, respectively. The study's conclusions indicate that Saudi Arabia and Indonesia apply the death sentence in quite comparable ways. In spite of this, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia employ rather different criteria when deciding whether to execute someone. Historical elements contribute to both Saudi Arabia's and Indonesia's criminal law systems' similarities and variances. While Indonesia employs a Civil Law legal system, which makes legislation the primary source of law, Saudi Arabia implements an Islamic legal system based on the Qur'an and Hadith.Keywords: Death penalty, Qhisas and Comparison Of Legal Systems

Ensiklopedia Education ReviewVol. 6(2)
Universitas Trisakti (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.