Judging Success by the Numbers: How an Overemphasis on Performance Metrics Can Damage Your Organization

This article examines the potential negative consequences that can arise from an overemphasis on quantitative performance metrics in the workplace, such as increased stress, risk of burnout, and lack of innovation, and presents an argument for integrating a more holistic and well-rounded approach to performance measurement that considers both quantitative and qualitative factors in order to promote employee well-being, engagement, and organizational sustainability in the long run. Drawing on research from psychology, leadership, and organizational behavior, the article analyzes case studies of companies that have successfully shifted to more balanced metrics and provides recommendations for how organizational leaders can audit existing practices and pilot test alternative approaches to achieve benefits to stakeholders while supporting mission-critical strategic goals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human capital leadership.
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.11.4.1
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judging Success by the Numbers: How an Overemphasis on Performance Metrics Can Damage Your Organization

Jonathan Westover
Human capital leadership.
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

Judging Success by the Numbers: How an Overemphasis on Performance Metrics Can Damage Your Organization

Jonathan Westover
article en

Abstract

This article examines the potential negative consequences that can arise from an overemphasis on quantitative performance metrics in the workplace, such as increased stress, risk of burnout, and lack of innovation, and presents an argument for integrating a more holistic and well-rounded approach to performance measurement that considers both quantitative and qualitative factors in order to promote employee well-being, engagement, and organizational sustainability in the long run. Drawing on research from psychology, leadership, and organizational behavior, the article analyzes case studies of companies that have successfully shifted to more balanced metrics and provides recommendations for how organizational leaders can audit existing practices and pilot test alternative approaches to achieve benefits to stakeholders while supporting mission-critical strategic goals.

Human capital leadership.Vol. 11(4)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Judging Success by the Numbers: How an Overemphasis on Performance Metrics Can Damage Your Organization — Jonathan Westover · Human capital leadership. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS