Pet dogs succeed where human companions fail: The presence of pet dogs reduces pain

Social support from family and friends, albeit associated with beneficial health effects, does not always help to cope with pain. This may be because humans elicit mixed expectations of social support and evaluative judgment. The present studies aimed to test whether pet dogs are a more beneficial source of support in a painful situation than human companions because they are not evaluative. For this, 74 (Study 1) and 50 (Study 2) women completed a cold-pressor task in the presence of either their own (S1) or an unfamiliar (S2) dog, a friend (S1), or an unknown human companion (S2), or alone. In both studies, participants reported less pain and exhibited less pain behavior in the presence of dogs compared to human companions. Reactions to pain were moderated by attitudes towards dogs in S2. This suggests that pet dogs may help individuals to cope with painful situations, especially if the individual in pain generally feels affectionate towards dogs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104418
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pet dogs succeed where human companions fail: The presence of pet dogs reduces pain

Aikaterini Fotopoulou, Heidi Mauersberger, Ursula S. Hess, Anne Springer et al.
2 citations
Acta Psychologica
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.10
article

Pet dogs succeed where human companions fail: The presence of pet dogs reduces pain

Aikaterini Fotopoulou, Heidi Mauersberger, Ursula S. Hess, Anne Springer, Christophe Blaison
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Social support from family and friends, albeit associated with beneficial health effects, does not always help to cope with pain. This may be because humans elicit mixed expectations of social support and evaluative judgment. The present studies aimed to test whether pet dogs are a more beneficial source of support in a painful situation than human companions because they are not evaluative. For this, 74 (Study 1) and 50 (Study 2) women completed a cold-pressor task in the presence of either their own (S1) or an unfamiliar (S2) dog, a friend (S1), or an unknown human companion (S2), or alone. In both studies, participants reported less pain and exhibited less pain behavior in the presence of dogs compared to human companions. Reactions to pain were moderated by attitudes towards dogs in S2. This suggests that pet dogs may help individuals to cope with painful situations, especially if the individual in pain generally feels affectionate towards dogs.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 249
Université Paris Cité (FR), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University College London (GB)
Volkswagen Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.