Pharmacists in the pharmacovigilance system

Introduction. In accordance with the rules of the GVP EAEU, good pharmacy practice and the national legislation of Russia, pharmacy organizations, as subjects of circulation of medicines, must collect and send reports of adverse reactions to the authorized body about the information they receive from patients. Objective. Studying the level of knowledge and practical skills, as well as the opinions of pharmacy workers about the pharmacovigilance system in order to develop practical management solutions to increase the participation of the pharmacy link in the pharmacovigilance system. Material and methods. Questionnaire method, descriptive statistics, non-prametric statistics according to the Kendal and Spearman test. Results. A Google link to the questionnaire was sent to 150 pharmacy ratings to complete. Employees of the retail pharmaceutical sector of the Republic of North Ossetia (Alania) took part in the questionnaire. 105 valid completed questionnaires were received. The return rate of the questionnaire is 70%. 62% of the respondents answered that an AR notification should be reported only if there is a proven causal relationship between taking the drug and the resulting AR; 30% believe that it should be sent if a causal relationship is suspected; 1% in free time from other duties; 7% – believe that it is necessary to report if the buyer asks for it. 39 (37,1%) of respondents answered that the decisive factor preventing them from filling out notices is the too long filing procedure, 56 (53,4%) of respondents referred to the lack of time for this procedure, 10 (9,5%) respondents – on the lack of meaning in this activity. The main stimulating factor that, according to the respondents, can motivate the receipt of notices is material. Conclusion. The study revealed an increase in the competencies of pharmacy workers and the search for solutions to motivate them to increase their involvement in the pharmacovigilance system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Farmaciya (Pharmacy)
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29296/25419218-2024-05-06
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacists in the pharmacovigilance system

А. А. Таубэ, V.A. Morozov
1 citations
Farmaciya (Pharmacy)
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
0.35
article

Pharmacists in the pharmacovigilance system

А. А. Таубэ, V.A. Morozov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction. In accordance with the rules of the GVP EAEU, good pharmacy practice and the national legislation of Russia, pharmacy organizations, as subjects of circulation of medicines, must collect and send reports of adverse reactions to the authorized body about the information they receive from patients. Objective. Studying the level of knowledge and practical skills, as well as the opinions of pharmacy workers about the pharmacovigilance system in order to develop practical management solutions to increase the participation of the pharmacy link in the pharmacovigilance system. Material and methods. Questionnaire method, descriptive statistics, non-prametric statistics according to the Kendal and Spearman test. Results. A Google link to the questionnaire was sent to 150 pharmacy ratings to complete. Employees of the retail pharmaceutical sector of the Republic of North Ossetia (Alania) took part in the questionnaire. 105 valid completed questionnaires were received. The return rate of the questionnaire is 70%. 62% of the respondents answered that an AR notification should be reported only if there is a proven causal relationship between taking the drug and the resulting AR; 30% believe that it should be sent if a causal relationship is suspected; 1% in free time from other duties; 7% – believe that it is necessary to report if the buyer asks for it. 39 (37,1%) of respondents answered that the decisive factor preventing them from filling out notices is the too long filing procedure, 56 (53,4%) of respondents referred to the lack of time for this procedure, 10 (9,5%) respondents – on the lack of meaning in this activity. The main stimulating factor that, according to the respondents, can motivate the receipt of notices is material. Conclusion. The study revealed an increase in the competencies of pharmacy workers and the search for solutions to motivate them to increase their involvement in the pharmacovigilance system.

Farmaciya (Pharmacy)Vol. 73(3)
North Ossetian State University (RU), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pharmacists in the pharmacovigilance system — А. А. Таубэ, V.A. Morozov · Farmaciya (Pharmacy) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS