Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for 3- and 5-year new-onset atrial fibrillation in HFpEF patients

Background Patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are more prone to atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Nevertheless, a risk prediction model for new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in HFpEF patients remains a notable gap, especially with respect to imaging indicators. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 402 HFpEF subjects reviewed at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2017 to 2023. Cox regression analysis was performed to screen predictors of NOAF. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors and internally validated through the bootstrap resampling method. A performance comparison between the nomogram and the mC 2 HEST score was performed. Results Out of the 402 participants, 62 (15%) developed atrial fibrillation. The risk factors for NOAF were finally screened out to include age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hyperthyroidism, renal dysfunction, left atrial anterior–posterior diameter (LAD), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), all of which were identified to create the nomogram. We calculated the bootstrap-corrected C-index (0.819, 95% CI: 0.762–0.870) and drew receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves [3-year areas under curves (AUC) = 0.827, 5-year AUC = 0.825], calibration curves, and clinical decision curves to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical adaptability of the six-factor nomogram. Based on two cutoff values calculated by X-tile software, the moderate- and high-risk groups had more NOAF cases than the low-risk group ( P < 0.0001). Our nomogram showed better 3- and 5-year NOAF predictive performance than the mC 2 HEST score estimated by the Integrated Discriminant Improvement Index (IDI) and the Net Reclassification Index (NRI) ( P < 0.05). Conclusions The nomogram combining clinical features with echocardiographic indices helps predict NOAF among HFpEF patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1429431
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for 3- and 5-year new-onset atrial fibrillation in HFpEF patients

Zhonglei Xie, Shuaishuai Wang, Wenzhong Zhang, Fengjiao Wang
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for 3- and 5-year new-onset atrial fibrillation in HFpEF patients

Zhonglei Xie, Shuaishuai Wang, Wenzhong Zhang, Fengjiao Wang
article en

Abstract

Background Patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are more prone to atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Nevertheless, a risk prediction model for new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in HFpEF patients remains a notable gap, especially with respect to imaging indicators. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 402 HFpEF subjects reviewed at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2017 to 2023. Cox regression analysis was performed to screen predictors of NOAF. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors and internally validated through the bootstrap resampling method. A performance comparison between the nomogram and the mC 2 HEST score was performed. Results Out of the 402 participants, 62 (15%) developed atrial fibrillation. The risk factors for NOAF were finally screened out to include age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hyperthyroidism, renal dysfunction, left atrial anterior–posterior diameter (LAD), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), all of which were identified to create the nomogram. We calculated the bootstrap-corrected C-index (0.819, 95% CI: 0.762–0.870) and drew receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves [3-year areas under curves (AUC) = 0.827, 5-year AUC = 0.825], calibration curves, and clinical decision curves to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical adaptability of the six-factor nomogram. Based on two cutoff values calculated by X-tile software, the moderate- and high-risk groups had more NOAF cases than the low-risk group ( P < 0.0001). Our nomogram showed better 3- and 5-year NOAF predictive performance than the mC 2 HEST score estimated by the Integrated Discriminant Improvement Index (IDI) and the Net Reclassification Index (NRI) ( P < 0.05). Conclusions The nomogram combining clinical features with echocardiographic indices helps predict NOAF among HFpEF patients.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 11
Qingdao University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.