Efficacy of Lung Ultrasound vs Chest X-Ray in Detecting Lung Consolidation and Edema in Premature Infants in the NICU

BACKGROUND The incidence of lung diseases in premature newborns is significantly higher than in full-term newborns due to their underdeveloped lungs. Ultrasound and X-ray are commonly-used bedside examinations in neonatology. This study primarily compares the efficacy of chest X-ray (CXR) and lung ultrasound (LUS) images in evaluating lung consolidation and edema in premature newborns at Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on LUS and CXR examination results, along with clinical records of premature newborns admitted to our hospital's NICU from November 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. CXR and LUS scans were performed on the same newborn within a day. We evaluated the consolidations and edema by interpreting the CXR and LUS images, then compared the findings. RESULTS Out of 75 cases, 34 showed lung consolidations on LUS (45%), while only 14 exhibited consolidations on CXR (19%). The detection rate of consolidations by LUS was significantly higher compared to CXR (34/75 vs 14/75, P<0.001). Differences were observed between the 2 bedside examinations in identifying consolidations, with some cases seen only on LUS. CXR struggled to accurately assess the severity of lung edema visible on LUS, showing significant disparity in detecting interstitial edema (53/75 vs 21/75, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS LUS outperforms chest CXR for bedside assessment of lung consolidation and edema in premature newborns.