Mechanism, vis motiva, and Fermentation: a Reassessment of Borelli’s Physiology

Abstract According to the standard view, Borelli was a strict mechanist who sought to explain organic processes by resorting to invisible mechanisms. This paper aims to show that his outlook on living organisms as contained in De motu animalium was far more nuanced than historians have maintained. Borelli resorted to vis motiva as the source of activity of corpuscles, a notion that was at odds with strict mechanism. He identified motive force with spirits, namely with self-moving particles of matter. Borelli combined anatomy and mechanism and integrated the latter with chemical experiments and analogies. Like most late–seventeenth century physiologists, Borelli resorted to fermentation to account for several physiological processes such as digestion, generation, and muscular motion. He distinguished two kinds of fermentative processes: a slow one, as in the case of digestion, and a quick one, as in the case of the presumed effervescence of the blood which he maintained was the cause of muscular movement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Science and Medicine
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15733823-20240110
Primary Topic
History of Science and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanism, vis motiva, and Fermentation: a Reassessment of Borelli’s Physiology

Carmen Schmechel, Antonio Clericuzio
Early Science and Medicine
History of Science and Medicine
article

Mechanism, vis motiva, and Fermentation: a Reassessment of Borelli’s Physiology

Carmen Schmechel, Antonio Clericuzio
article en

Abstract

Abstract According to the standard view, Borelli was a strict mechanist who sought to explain organic processes by resorting to invisible mechanisms. This paper aims to show that his outlook on living organisms as contained in De motu animalium was far more nuanced than historians have maintained. Borelli resorted to vis motiva as the source of activity of corpuscles, a notion that was at odds with strict mechanism. He identified motive force with spirits, namely with self-moving particles of matter. Borelli combined anatomy and mechanism and integrated the latter with chemical experiments and analogies. Like most late–seventeenth century physiologists, Borelli resorted to fermentation to account for several physiological processes such as digestion, generation, and muscular motion. He distinguished two kinds of fermentative processes: a slow one, as in the case of digestion, and a quick one, as in the case of the presumed effervescence of the blood which he maintained was the cause of muscular movement.

Early Science and MedicineVol. 29(4)
Roma Tre University (IT), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
History of Science and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mechanism, vis motiva, and Fermentation: a Reassessment of Borelli’s Physiology — Carmen Schmechel, Antonio Clericuzio · Early Science and Medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS