Disability 4.0: bioethical considerations on the use of embodied artificial intelligence

Robotics and artificial intelligence have marked the beginning of a new era in the care and integration of people with disabilities, helping to promote their independence, autonomy and social participation. In this area, bioethical reflection assumes a key role at anthropological, ethical, legal and socio-political levels. However, there is currently a substantial diversity of opinions and ethical arguments, as well as a lack of consensus on the use of assistive robots, while the focus remains predominantly on the usability of products. The article presents a bioethical analysis that highlights the risk arising from using embodied artificial intelligence according to a functionalist model. Failure to recognize disability as the result of a complex interplay between health, personal and situational factors could result in potential damage to the intrinsic dignity of the person and human relations with healthcare workers. Furthermore, the danger of discrimination in accessing these new technologies is highlighted, emphasizing the need for an ethical approach that considers the social and moral implications of implementing embodied AI in the field of rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1437280
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disability 4.0: bioethical considerations on the use of embodied artificial intelligence

Roberto Scendoni, Mariano Cingolani, Francesco De Micco, Paola Frati et al.
7 citations
Frontiers in Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.84
article

Disability 4.0: bioethical considerations on the use of embodied artificial intelligence

Roberto Scendoni, Mariano Cingolani, Francesco De Micco, Paola Frati, Vittoradolfo Tambone
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Robotics and artificial intelligence have marked the beginning of a new era in the care and integration of people with disabilities, helping to promote their independence, autonomy and social participation. In this area, bioethical reflection assumes a key role at anthropological, ethical, legal and socio-political levels. However, there is currently a substantial diversity of opinions and ethical arguments, as well as a lack of consensus on the use of assistive robots, while the focus remains predominantly on the usability of products. The article presents a bioethical analysis that highlights the risk arising from using embodied artificial intelligence according to a functionalist model. Failure to recognize disability as the result of a complex interplay between health, personal and situational factors could result in potential damage to the intrinsic dignity of the person and human relations with healthcare workers. Furthermore, the danger of discrimination in accessing these new technologies is highlighted, emphasizing the need for an ethical approach that considers the social and moral implications of implementing embodied AI in the field of rehabilitation.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 11
Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), University of Macerata (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
European Commission
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disability 4.0: bioethical considerations on the use of embodied artificial intelligence — Roberto Scendoni, Mariano Cingolani, et al. · Frontiers in Medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS