A New Constraint to the Entitlement of a Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles? – Implications of the Recent Case Law

Abstract The recent judgments of the International Court of Justice ( ICJ ) in Nicaragua v. Colombia and of a special chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Mauritius/Maldives provide significant developments to the legal regime of the continental shelf within the law of the sea, as well as its relationship to the exclusive economic zone. Specifically, the ICJ stated that the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles cannot overlap with the area within 200 nautical miles of another State’s baselines. This decision potentially creates a new constraint line to a coastal State’s entitlement to a continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles. Furthermore, the two decisions blur the distinction between delineation and delimitation of the continental shelf. They hold significant implications for the concept of a ‘single continental shelf’ and raise questions about the necessity of establishing grey areas in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A New Constraint to the Entitlement of a Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles? – Implications of the Recent Case Law

L. L. Bernard, Hilde Woker
1 citations
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
International Maritime Law Issues
0.71
article

A New Constraint to the Entitlement of a Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles? – Implications of the Recent Case Law

L. L. Bernard, Hilde Woker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The recent judgments of the International Court of Justice ( ICJ ) in Nicaragua v. Colombia and of a special chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Mauritius/Maldives provide significant developments to the legal regime of the continental shelf within the law of the sea, as well as its relationship to the exclusive economic zone. Specifically, the ICJ stated that the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles cannot overlap with the area within 200 nautical miles of another State’s baselines. This decision potentially creates a new constraint line to a coastal State’s entitlement to a continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles. Furthermore, the two decisions blur the distinction between delineation and delimitation of the continental shelf. They hold significant implications for the concept of a ‘single continental shelf’ and raise questions about the necessity of establishing grey areas in the future.

The International Journal of Marine and Coastal LawVol. 40(1)
Leiden University (NL), University of Wollongong (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
International Maritime Law Issues
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.