Thirty-five years of sensemaking in the business & management research: a bibliometric analysis, review and discussion

Abstract Sensemaking is widely acknowledged as providing valuable guidance on how individuals and groups organize to perceive issues at stake, thereby lessening the negative impacts of future unknowns. Sensemaking is not a new field, yet events surrounding the recent COVID-19 pandemic may benefit from a sensemaking perspective. While prior reviews have considered sensemaking research, this is arguably the first bibliometric review of sensemaking and its application across the entire business and management domain. From 2,838 articles, we used performance analysis and science mapping techniques to offer propositions and avenues for future research. We advance theory and offer practical implications by identifying and providing context about prominent theorists, authors, journals, articles, and environments where sensemaking has been studied. Thirty-five years after the first article on sensemaking was published, this paper offers an extensive review demonstrating the evolution, current interests, and future directions of sensemaking research in the business and management discipline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Review Quarterly
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00458-5
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thirty-five years of sensemaking in the business & management research: a bibliometric analysis, review and discussion

Anup Shrestha, Fiona Russo, Gary Eckstein
7 citations
Management Review Quarterly
Innovation and Knowledge Management
3.88
article

Thirty-five years of sensemaking in the business & management research: a bibliometric analysis, review and discussion

Anup Shrestha, Fiona Russo, Gary Eckstein
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Sensemaking is widely acknowledged as providing valuable guidance on how individuals and groups organize to perceive issues at stake, thereby lessening the negative impacts of future unknowns. Sensemaking is not a new field, yet events surrounding the recent COVID-19 pandemic may benefit from a sensemaking perspective. While prior reviews have considered sensemaking research, this is arguably the first bibliometric review of sensemaking and its application across the entire business and management domain. From 2,838 articles, we used performance analysis and science mapping techniques to offer propositions and avenues for future research. We advance theory and offer practical implications by identifying and providing context about prominent theorists, authors, journals, articles, and environments where sensemaking has been studied. Thirty-five years after the first article on sensemaking was published, this paper offers an extensive review demonstrating the evolution, current interests, and future directions of sensemaking research in the business and management discipline.

Management Review QuarterlyVol. 75(4)
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
University of Southern Queensland
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
3.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.