Is there creatine in plants? The true compound behind the 1H NMR signal at 3.05 ppm in plant extracts

Introduction Some papers describe the presence of creatine in plants, based on a singlet signal at 3.02–3.05 ppm in the 1 H NMR spectra. Although is there creatine in plants? Therefore, to answer this question, a comprehensive NMR investigation has been performed aiming the unambiguous assignment of the compound responsible for that signal. Objective Determine whether the compound behind the signal at 3.05 ppm is truly creatine or if it was just a misassignment, instead. Methods Samples of leaves and cherries from Eugenia uniflora in their natural swollen state were submitted to HR-MAS NMR analysis. Results It was found that the signal at 3.05 ppm was misassigned to creatine. The exhaustive NMR investigation revealed that the signal is related to the amino acid 4-hydroxy- N -methyl proline, instead. Conclusion The comprehensive NMR investigation revealed that there is no creatine in plants, it was just a misassignment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Natural Products
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fntpr.2024.1360175
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there creatine in plants? The true compound behind the 1H NMR signal at 3.05 ppm in plant extracts

Andersson Barison, Sher Ali, Kahlil Schwanka Salomé, Caroline Da Ros Montes D’Oca et al.
Frontiers in Natural Products
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

Is there creatine in plants? The true compound behind the 1H NMR signal at 3.05 ppm in plant extracts

Andersson Barison, Sher Ali, Kahlil Schwanka Salomé, Caroline Da Ros Montes D’Oca, Leice Milla Ribeiro de Novais
article en

Abstract

Introduction Some papers describe the presence of creatine in plants, based on a singlet signal at 3.02–3.05 ppm in the 1 H NMR spectra. Although is there creatine in plants? Therefore, to answer this question, a comprehensive NMR investigation has been performed aiming the unambiguous assignment of the compound responsible for that signal. Objective Determine whether the compound behind the signal at 3.05 ppm is truly creatine or if it was just a misassignment, instead. Methods Samples of leaves and cherries from Eugenia uniflora in their natural swollen state were submitted to HR-MAS NMR analysis. Results It was found that the signal at 3.05 ppm was misassigned to creatine. The exhaustive NMR investigation revealed that the signal is related to the amino acid 4-hydroxy- N -methyl proline, instead. Conclusion The comprehensive NMR investigation revealed that there is no creatine in plants, it was just a misassignment.

Frontiers in Natural ProductsVol. 3
Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Araucária, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.