Social Connections as a Protective Factor for Sexual Violence-Related Attitudes

Endorsing problematic sexual violence-related attitudes including rape myth acceptance (RMA), hostile sexism, and disapproval of sexual consent is associated with negative outcomes, including the perpetration of sexual violence. This study examined social connections as a protective factor for sexual violence-related attitudes among a sample of 770 participants. Results indicate that in the full sample, connections to a workplace were protective for RMA and hostile sexism while family connections were protective for disapproval of sexual consent, RMA, and hostile sexism. Patterns of other social connections differed in separate models for men and women. Unexpected findings indicating that connections to a religious social group are a risk, not a protective, factor are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Violence Against Women
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241270187
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Connections as a Protective Factor for Sexual Violence-Related Attitudes

Alison C. Cares, Jill C. Hoxmeier, Julia O’Connor, Jackie Woerner
2 citations
Violence Against Women
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
1.86
article

Social Connections as a Protective Factor for Sexual Violence-Related Attitudes

Alison C. Cares, Jill C. Hoxmeier, Julia O’Connor, Jackie Woerner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Endorsing problematic sexual violence-related attitudes including rape myth acceptance (RMA), hostile sexism, and disapproval of sexual consent is associated with negative outcomes, including the perpetration of sexual violence. This study examined social connections as a protective factor for sexual violence-related attitudes among a sample of 770 participants. Results indicate that in the full sample, connections to a workplace were protective for RMA and hostile sexism while family connections were protective for disapproval of sexual consent, RMA, and hostile sexism. Patterns of other social connections differed in separate models for men and women. Unexpected findings indicating that connections to a religious social group are a risk, not a protective, factor are discussed.

Violence Against WomenVol. 31(11)
University of Central Florida (US), Oregon State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.