Simultaneous onboard analysis of seawater dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration and stable isotope ratio (<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C‐DIC)

Abstract Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and its stable carbon isotope ( δ 13 C‐DIC) are valuable parameters for studying the aquatic carbon cycle and quantifying ocean anthropogenic carbon accumulation rates. However, the potential of this coupled pair is underexploited as only 15% or less of cruise samples have been analyzed for δ 13 C‐DIC because the traditional isotope analysis is labor‐intensive and restricted to onshore laboratories. Here, we improved the analytical precision and reported the protocol of an automated, efficient, and high‐precision method for ship‐based DIC and δ 13 C‐DIC analysis based on cavity ring‐down spectroscopy (CRDS). We also introduced a set of stable in‐house standards to ensure accurate and consistent DIC and δ 13 C‐DIC measurements, especially on prolonged cruises. With this method, we analyzed over 1600 discrete seawater samples over a 40‐d cruise along the North American eastern ocean margin in summer 2022, representing the first effort to collect a large dataset of δ 13 C‐DIC onboard of any oceanographic expedition. We evaluated the method's uncertainty, which was 1.2 μ mol kg −1 for the DIC concentration and 0.03‰ for the δ 13 C‐DIC value (1 σ ). An interlaboratory comparison of onboard DIC concentration analysis revealed an average offset of 2.0 ± 3.8 μ mol kg −1 between CRDS and the coulometry‐based results. The cross‐validation of δ 13 C‐DIC in the deep‐ocean data exhibited a mean difference of only −0.03‰ ± 0.07‰, emphasizing the consistency with historical data. Potential applications in aquatic biogeochemistry are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10642
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simultaneous onboard analysis of seawater dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration and stable isotope ratio (δ13C‐DIC)

Zhangxian Ouyang, Eliot A. Atekwana, Najid Hussain, Wei‐Jun Cai et al.
2 citations
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
0.96
article

Simultaneous onboard analysis of seawater dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration and stable isotope ratio (δ13C‐DIC)

Zhangxian Ouyang, Eliot A. Atekwana, Najid Hussain, Wei‐Jun Cai, Charles Featherstone, Zhentao Sun, Xinyu Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and its stable carbon isotope ( δ 13 C‐DIC) are valuable parameters for studying the aquatic carbon cycle and quantifying ocean anthropogenic carbon accumulation rates. However, the potential of this coupled pair is underexploited as only 15% or less of cruise samples have been analyzed for δ 13 C‐DIC because the traditional isotope analysis is labor‐intensive and restricted to onshore laboratories. Here, we improved the analytical precision and reported the protocol of an automated, efficient, and high‐precision method for ship‐based DIC and δ 13 C‐DIC analysis based on cavity ring‐down spectroscopy (CRDS). We also introduced a set of stable in‐house standards to ensure accurate and consistent DIC and δ 13 C‐DIC measurements, especially on prolonged cruises. With this method, we analyzed over 1600 discrete seawater samples over a 40‐d cruise along the North American eastern ocean margin in summer 2022, representing the first effort to collect a large dataset of δ 13 C‐DIC onboard of any oceanographic expedition. We evaluated the method's uncertainty, which was 1.2 μ mol kg −1 for the DIC concentration and 0.03‰ for the δ 13 C‐DIC value (1 σ ). An interlaboratory comparison of onboard DIC concentration analysis revealed an average offset of 2.0 ± 3.8 μ mol kg −1 between CRDS and the coulometry‐based results. The cross‐validation of δ 13 C‐DIC in the deep‐ocean data exhibited a mean difference of only −0.03‰ ± 0.07‰, emphasizing the consistency with historical data. Potential applications in aquatic biogeochemistry are discussed.

Limnology and Oceanography MethodsVol. 22(11)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Washington (US), NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of Delaware (US)
National Science Foundation, Caterpillar, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
0.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.