Megaprojects: Beyond the managerial and activist traps

The megaprojects paradox is still there: while large investments, infrastructures, facilities, and variegated ventures are more in demand than ever, scientific criticism and public opposition are increasingly strong, and difficulties to formulate alternative policies and development patterns are notorious. The impossibility of getting out of the paradox is due to the managerial and activist traps in which the scholarship on megaprojects is caught. This paper advocates for a more direct and conscious cross-fertilization between managerial and activist approaches on megaprojects in order to overcome their respective traps. It identifies 10 axes for further future collaboration which will serve as a basis for a shared research agenda. In this research agenda, the study of megaprojects appears as an autonomous research field in which the relationship between megaprojects and development patterns is systematically assessed and the analysis of policy alternatives to megaprojects becomes pivotal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241274065
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Megaprojects: Beyond the managerial and activist traps

Paolo Beria, Ander Audikana, Javier Arellano-Yanguas
2 citations
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Public-Private Partnership Projects
1.11
article

Megaprojects: Beyond the managerial and activist traps

Paolo Beria, Ander Audikana, Javier Arellano-Yanguas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The megaprojects paradox is still there: while large investments, infrastructures, facilities, and variegated ventures are more in demand than ever, scientific criticism and public opposition are increasingly strong, and difficulties to formulate alternative policies and development patterns are notorious. The impossibility of getting out of the paradox is due to the managerial and activist traps in which the scholarship on megaprojects is caught. This paper advocates for a more direct and conscious cross-fertilization between managerial and activist approaches on megaprojects in order to overcome their respective traps. It identifies 10 axes for further future collaboration which will serve as a basis for a shared research agenda. In this research agenda, the study of megaprojects appears as an autonomous research field in which the relationship between megaprojects and development patterns is systematically assessed and the analysis of policy alternatives to megaprojects becomes pivotal.

Environment and Planning C Politics and SpaceVol. 43(4)
Universidad de Deusto (ES), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Politecnico di Milano
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Megaprojects: Beyond the managerial and activist traps — Paolo Beria, Ander Audikana, et al. · Environment and Planning C Politics and Space (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS