Hundred Eyes or Hundred Wild Geese: An Examination of How Historical Sources were Made in Marco Polo’s Time

Abstract: By analyzing two similar but different prophecies respectively preserved in Marco Polo’s travelogue and Chinese writings, this article seeks to shed light on the mechanism of information circulation and preservation in Mongol Eurasia. It shows that the prophecy in Marco Polo’s book was compatible with European imagination of the Mongols during the thirteenth century while the prophecy in Chinese sources was consistent with Chinese understanding of the Mongols in this time. It argues that during the Mongol period historical information compatible with authors’ repertoires of knowledge and with target audiences’ understanding were more likely preserved in written texts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of world history
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2024.a935009
Primary Topic
Historical and Archaeological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hundred Eyes or Hundred Wild Geese: An Examination of How Historical Sources were Made in Marco Polo’s Time

Haiwei Liu
Journal of world history
Historical and Archaeological Studies
article

Hundred Eyes or Hundred Wild Geese: An Examination of How Historical Sources were Made in Marco Polo’s Time

Haiwei Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract: By analyzing two similar but different prophecies respectively preserved in Marco Polo’s travelogue and Chinese writings, this article seeks to shed light on the mechanism of information circulation and preservation in Mongol Eurasia. It shows that the prophecy in Marco Polo’s book was compatible with European imagination of the Mongols during the thirteenth century while the prophecy in Chinese sources was consistent with Chinese understanding of the Mongols in this time. It argues that during the Mongol period historical information compatible with authors’ repertoires of knowledge and with target audiences’ understanding were more likely preserved in written texts.

Journal of world historyVol. 35(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Historical and Archaeological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.