The Effect of Communicating AI Confidence on Human Decision Making When Performing a Binary Decision Task

In this study, we experimentally analyzed whether people can perceive the accuracy or smartness of AI judgments, and whether the judgment accuracy of AI and the level of confidence in those judgments affect people’s decision-making. The results showed that people may perceive an AI’s smartness even when it only presents information on the results of its judgments. The results also suggest that AI accuracy and confidence affect human decision-making, and that the magnitude of the effect of AI confidence varies with AI accuracy. We also found that when a person’s ability to make a decision is less than or equal to the AI’s ability to make a decision, the human performance in a binary decision task improves regardless of AI accuracy. The results obtained in this study are similar in some respects to relationships in which people make decisions while interacting, and the findings from research on human interactions may apply to the research and development of human–AI interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167192
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Communicating AI Confidence on Human Decision Making When Performing a Binary Decision Task

Wen Liang Yeoh, Osamu Fukuda, Nanami Ishizu, Hiroshi Okumura
5 citations
Applied Sciences
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
1.74
article

The Effect of Communicating AI Confidence on Human Decision Making When Performing a Binary Decision Task

Wen Liang Yeoh, Osamu Fukuda, Nanami Ishizu, Hiroshi Okumura
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In this study, we experimentally analyzed whether people can perceive the accuracy or smartness of AI judgments, and whether the judgment accuracy of AI and the level of confidence in those judgments affect people’s decision-making. The results showed that people may perceive an AI’s smartness even when it only presents information on the results of its judgments. The results also suggest that AI accuracy and confidence affect human decision-making, and that the magnitude of the effect of AI confidence varies with AI accuracy. We also found that when a person’s ability to make a decision is less than or equal to the AI’s ability to make a decision, the human performance in a binary decision task improves regardless of AI accuracy. The results obtained in this study are similar in some respects to relationships in which people make decisions while interacting, and the findings from research on human interactions may apply to the research and development of human–AI interactions.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(16)
Saga University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.