Analytical Validation of a DNA Methylation Biomarker Test for the Diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma from Samples Collected Using EsoCheck®, a Non-Endoscopic Esophageal Cell Collection Device

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Guidelines recommend BE screening in populations with multiple risk factors, for which non-endoscopic esophageal cell collection with biomarker testing is considered as an acceptable alternative to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to evaluate analytical performance characteristics of EsoGuard<sup>®</sup> (EG), a DNA methylation biomarker assay, as a laboratory-developed test (LDT) in esophageal samples collected with the swallowable EsoCheck<sup>®</sup> (EC) device. EG is a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay that evaluates methylated <i>vimentin</i> (<i>VIM</i>) and <i>cyclin A1</i> (<i>CCNA1</i>), clinically validated biomarkers for the detection of BE and EAC. The studies were conducted according to standards of College of American Pathology (CAP), Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), and New York (NY) state requirements for the analytical validation of molecular assays. Comparison to Sanger sequencing showed that EG was 100% accurate at all 31 CpG sites evaluated by the assay. The analytical sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assay were 89%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. Intra- and inter-assay precision was 100%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 1 in 400 methylated cells, and the reference range was 84%. In summary, EsoGuard demonstrates high analytical accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility in samples collected using the EsoCheck device.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161784
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical Validation of a DNA Methylation Biomarker Test for the Diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma from Samples Collected Using EsoCheck®, a Non-Endoscopic Esophageal Cell Collection Device

Victoria T. Lee, Abhisek Ghosal, Lishan Aklog, Suman Verma et al.
5 citations
Diagnostics
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
2.86
article

Analytical Validation of a DNA Methylation Biomarker Test for the Diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma from Samples Collected Using EsoCheck®, a Non-Endoscopic Esophageal Cell Collection Device

Victoria T. Lee, Abhisek Ghosal, Lishan Aklog, Suman Verma, Brian J. deGuzman, Ivy T. Le
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Guidelines recommend BE screening in populations with multiple risk factors, for which non-endoscopic esophageal cell collection with biomarker testing is considered as an acceptable alternative to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to evaluate analytical performance characteristics of EsoGuard<sup>®</sup> (EG), a DNA methylation biomarker assay, as a laboratory-developed test (LDT) in esophageal samples collected with the swallowable EsoCheck<sup>®</sup> (EC) device. EG is a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay that evaluates methylated <i>vimentin</i> (<i>VIM</i>) and <i>cyclin A1</i> (<i>CCNA1</i>), clinically validated biomarkers for the detection of BE and EAC. The studies were conducted according to standards of College of American Pathology (CAP), Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), and New York (NY) state requirements for the analytical validation of molecular assays. Comparison to Sanger sequencing showed that EG was 100% accurate at all 31 CpG sites evaluated by the assay. The analytical sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assay were 89%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. Intra- and inter-assay precision was 100%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 1 in 400 methylated cells, and the reference range was 84%. In summary, EsoGuard demonstrates high analytical accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility in samples collected using the EsoCheck device.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(16)
Lucid Technologies (United States) (US)
Case Western Reserve University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analytical Validation of a DNA Methylation Biomarker Test for the Diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma from Samples Collected Using EsoCheck®, a Non-Endoscopic Esophageal Cell Collection Device — Victoria T. Lee, Abhisek Ghosal, et al. · Diagnostics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS