A Single-Surgeon Experience Transitioning to Total Arterial Revascularization

<b>Background:</b> Coronary artery bypass grafting remains the standard of care for advanced and multifocal coronary artery disease; however, for patients that are surgical candidates, total arterial revascularization (TAR) remains underutilized due to concerns such as sternal wound infections and the learning curve. We present the results of a large cohort of mid-career surgeons transitioning to TAR, focusing on short-term outcomes and the learning curve. <b>Methods:</b> The surgeons transitioned to using TAR as the preferred revascularization technique in August of 2017. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent isolated non-emergent CABG performed by a single surgeon from January 2014 through January 2022. Patients were divided into two groups-those who had TAR and those who had traditional CABG using one internal mammary artery and vein grafts (IMA-SVG). <b>Results:</b> Eight hundred ninety-eight patients meet inclusion criteria (458 IMA-SVG and 440 TAR). The TAR group had slightly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross clamp times, and operative times (all <i>p</i> < 0.05); however, ICU stay was shorter and 30-day readmission rate was lower for TAR compared to IMA-SVG (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The TAR group also required fewer postoperative transfusions (<i>p</i> = 0.005). There was no difference in prolonged intubation, stroke, length of stay, mortality, or sternal wound complications between groups (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). The average TAR was 30 min longer; however, learning curves, stratified by number of grafts placed, showed no significant learning curve associated with TAR. <b>Conclusions:</b> An experienced surgeon transitioning from IMA-SVG to TAR slightly increases operative time, but decreases ICU stay, readmissions, and postoperative transfusions with no significant difference in rates of immediate post-operative complications or 30-day mortality, with a minimal learning curve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164831
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Single-Surgeon Experience Transitioning to Total Arterial Revascularization

Sharif A. Sabe, Michelle Doherty, Dwight D. Harris, Louis M. Chu et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

A Single-Surgeon Experience Transitioning to Total Arterial Revascularization

Sharif A. Sabe, Michelle Doherty, Dwight D. Harris, Louis M. Chu, Venkatachalam Senthilnathan
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Coronary artery bypass grafting remains the standard of care for advanced and multifocal coronary artery disease; however, for patients that are surgical candidates, total arterial revascularization (TAR) remains underutilized due to concerns such as sternal wound infections and the learning curve. We present the results of a large cohort of mid-career surgeons transitioning to TAR, focusing on short-term outcomes and the learning curve. <b>Methods:</b> The surgeons transitioned to using TAR as the preferred revascularization technique in August of 2017. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent isolated non-emergent CABG performed by a single surgeon from January 2014 through January 2022. Patients were divided into two groups-those who had TAR and those who had traditional CABG using one internal mammary artery and vein grafts (IMA-SVG). <b>Results:</b> Eight hundred ninety-eight patients meet inclusion criteria (458 IMA-SVG and 440 TAR). The TAR group had slightly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross clamp times, and operative times (all <i>p</i> < 0.05); however, ICU stay was shorter and 30-day readmission rate was lower for TAR compared to IMA-SVG (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The TAR group also required fewer postoperative transfusions (<i>p</i> = 0.005). There was no difference in prolonged intubation, stroke, length of stay, mortality, or sternal wound complications between groups (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). The average TAR was 30 min longer; however, learning curves, stratified by number of grafts placed, showed no significant learning curve associated with TAR. <b>Conclusions:</b> An experienced surgeon transitioning from IMA-SVG to TAR slightly increases operative time, but decreases ICU stay, readmissions, and postoperative transfusions with no significant difference in rates of immediate post-operative complications or 30-day mortality, with a minimal learning curve.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(16)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.