Impact of Interval versus Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculus Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

Background: The optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute calculus cholecystitis is debated. This study compares the outcomes of early versus interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute calculus cholecystitis. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis at the Department of General Surgery, MVJMCRH, from December 2021 to November 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: early cholecystectomy (EC, n=51) and interval cholecystectomy (IC, n=32). Data on operative time, blood loss, need for ICU stay, postoperative complications, and hospital stay were collected and analysed. Results: The average duration of surgery was significantly longer in the EC group (129 ± 39.7 minutes) compared to the IC group (82 ± 22.5 minutes, p<0.0001). Mean blood loss was higher in the EC group (55 ± 12.5 ml) than in the IC group (25 ± 6.2 ml, p<0.0001). The need for ICU stay and the incidence of postoperative complications were higher in the EC group, but these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The average of the total hospital stay was significantly shorter for the EC group (4.72 ± 2.57 days) compared to the IC group (index admission and admission for surgery) (8.18 ± 4.63 days, p=0.0001). Conclusions: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, despite longer operative times and higher blood loss, is a safe option without increasing postoperative complications resulting in reduced overall duration of hospital stay as well as total cost incurred by the patient. These findings support the recommendation for early surgical intervention in managing acute calculus cholecystitis, aligning with current guidelines and evidence from other studies. Tailoring the timing of surgery to individual patient profiles remains essential to optimize outcomes and ensure patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/sr24806222753
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Interval versus Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculus Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

Bhaskaran Ashokan, Milind H. Iddalagi, Udaattaa Nairy, Roopali S Gadekar et al.
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Impact of Interval versus Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculus Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

Bhaskaran Ashokan, Milind H. Iddalagi, Udaattaa Nairy, Roopali S Gadekar, x Keerthiraj
article en

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute calculus cholecystitis is debated. This study compares the outcomes of early versus interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute calculus cholecystitis. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis at the Department of General Surgery, MVJMCRH, from December 2021 to November 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: early cholecystectomy (EC, n=51) and interval cholecystectomy (IC, n=32). Data on operative time, blood loss, need for ICU stay, postoperative complications, and hospital stay were collected and analysed. Results: The average duration of surgery was significantly longer in the EC group (129 ± 39.7 minutes) compared to the IC group (82 ± 22.5 minutes, p<0.0001). Mean blood loss was higher in the EC group (55 ± 12.5 ml) than in the IC group (25 ± 6.2 ml, p<0.0001). The need for ICU stay and the incidence of postoperative complications were higher in the EC group, but these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The average of the total hospital stay was significantly shorter for the EC group (4.72 ± 2.57 days) compared to the IC group (index admission and admission for surgery) (8.18 ± 4.63 days, p=0.0001). Conclusions: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, despite longer operative times and higher blood loss, is a safe option without increasing postoperative complications resulting in reduced overall duration of hospital stay as well as total cost incurred by the patient. These findings support the recommendation for early surgical intervention in managing acute calculus cholecystitis, aligning with current guidelines and evidence from other studies. Tailoring the timing of surgery to individual patient profiles remains essential to optimize outcomes and ensure patient safety.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Vol. 13(8)
MVJ Medical College and Research Hospital (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Interval versus Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculus Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes — Bhaskaran Ashokan, Milind H. Iddalagi, et al. · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS