Research on digital governance based on Web of Science—a bibliometric analysis

Exploring digital governance is essential for grasping how technology can be employed to enhance public services, boost efficiency, and foster transparency and engagement. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of digital governance research in order to explore its development, emerging research trends, network of leading researchers, countries and institutions that contribute greatly to this field. A bibliometric study was conducted on digital governance works using the following terms: “digital governance,” “E-governance,” “digital government,” and “E-government” as the keywords. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were two tools used for the bibliometric analysis. Results showed that the United States played a dominate role in digital governance studies, followed by China, the United Kingdom, India, and Spain. Brunel University, University at Albany, and University of Johannesburg were the top three research institutes for digital governance. Reddick C.G., Weerakkody V., Dwivedi, Y. K., Mensah, I. K., and Jaeger, P.T. served as the representative researchers in this field. In addition, topics including usability and reliability of digital governance system, quality assurance under the framework of digital governance, the quality of digital service, impact of digital governance on public perception, effects of digital transformation on public value perceptions were the focal points in recent years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1403404
Citations
9
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on digital governance based on Web of Science—a bibliometric analysis

Mohd Rizal Yaakop, Lin Zhao
9 citations
Frontiers in Political Science
E-Government and Public Services
20.08
article

Research on digital governance based on Web of Science—a bibliometric analysis

Mohd Rizal Yaakop, Lin Zhao
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Exploring digital governance is essential for grasping how technology can be employed to enhance public services, boost efficiency, and foster transparency and engagement. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of digital governance research in order to explore its development, emerging research trends, network of leading researchers, countries and institutions that contribute greatly to this field. A bibliometric study was conducted on digital governance works using the following terms: “digital governance,” “E-governance,” “digital government,” and “E-government” as the keywords. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were two tools used for the bibliometric analysis. Results showed that the United States played a dominate role in digital governance studies, followed by China, the United Kingdom, India, and Spain. Brunel University, University at Albany, and University of Johannesburg were the top three research institutes for digital governance. Reddick C.G., Weerakkody V., Dwivedi, Y. K., Mensah, I. K., and Jaeger, P.T. served as the representative researchers in this field. In addition, topics including usability and reliability of digital governance system, quality assurance under the framework of digital governance, the quality of digital service, impact of digital governance on public perception, effects of digital transformation on public value perceptions were the focal points in recent years.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 6
National University of Malaysia (MY)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
E-Government and Public Services
20.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.