Resilience of uneven-aged mixedwood stands altered by diameter-limit cutting and opportunities for their rehabilitation

Repeated diameter-limit cutting in mixedwood forests often leads to altered stand composition, quality, and regeneration, hence decreasing productivity and value over time. We studied the evolution of stand characteristics after diameter-limit cutting on a 15-year period, beginning from 11 to 43 years after cutting. We used 415 sample plots (200 m 2 ) and three criteria: (i) ≥9.0 m 2 /ha overstory (trees ≥9.1 cm dbh [diameter at breast height, 1.3 m above ground]) acceptable growing stock (AGS, i.e. basal area of vigorous trees with sawlog potential), (ii) ≥3.0 m 2 /ha pole timber AGS (9.1 cm-23.0 cm dbh) and (iii) ≥60% sapling (dbh 1.1-9.0 cm) stocking of desired species. Stand initial quality was determined in function of overstory AGS at the beginning of the monitoring period: good quality (AGS≥9.0 m 2 /ha), impoverished (7.0≤AGS< 9.0 m 2 /ha), degraded (AGS <7.0 m 2 /ha). After 15 years, 47% of stands satisfied at least two criteria, but most stands (65%) had insufficient sapling regeneration. Stands in good quality and impoverished categories had sufficient basal area and AGS to support a new partial cutting cycle, contrary to stands in the degraded category. A conceptual model based on these three criteria is presented to guide silvicultural rehabilitation of uneven-aged mixedwood stands altered by past cutting practices.