Co-design, neighbourhood sharing, and commoning through urban living labs

This paper examines the role of co-design methods in catalysing neighbourhood sharing and commoning in European cities. Through the comparative analysis of two design-mediated Urban Living Labs (ULLs) in Bagneux/Paris and Poplar/London, the paper explores how neighbourhood sharing of goods, spaces, and experiences are sustained in two different contexts. The paper then presents a co-design framework which was implemented in both cities, catalysing new sharing projects and relations in support of urban commons. We conclude that nesting co-design practices within 'civic-organic' ULLs can help to foster productive long-term relations between communities and academic partners based on mutual trust and help to initiate new sharing practices in the neighbourhoods of study. We argue that co-design methods are generative in this space, flattening knowledge hierarchies, supporting action on the ground, and developing situated responses to local needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CoDesign
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2024.2381792
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-design, neighbourhood sharing, and commoning through urban living labs

Andrew Belfield, Doina Petrescu
12 citations
CoDesign
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
8.77
article

Co-design, neighbourhood sharing, and commoning through urban living labs

Andrew Belfield, Doina Petrescu
article en
12 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the role of co-design methods in catalysing neighbourhood sharing and commoning in European cities. Through the comparative analysis of two design-mediated Urban Living Labs (ULLs) in Bagneux/Paris and Poplar/London, the paper explores how neighbourhood sharing of goods, spaces, and experiences are sustained in two different contexts. The paper then presents a co-design framework which was implemented in both cities, catalysing new sharing projects and relations in support of urban commons. We conclude that nesting co-design practices within 'civic-organic' ULLs can help to foster productive long-term relations between communities and academic partners based on mutual trust and help to initiate new sharing practices in the neighbourhoods of study. We argue that co-design methods are generative in this space, flattening knowledge hierarchies, supporting action on the ground, and developing situated responses to local needs.

CoDesignVol. 21(2)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Joint Programming Initiative Urban Europe, Economic and Social Research Council
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
8.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co-design, neighbourhood sharing, and commoning through urban living labs — Andrew Belfield, Doina Petrescu · CoDesign (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS