Prognostic value of non-invasive programmed ventricular stimulation after VT ablation to predict VT recurrences
In patients after VT ablation and structural heart disease, NIPS is superior to post-ablation PVS to stratify the risk of VT recurrences. The PPV and NPV of NIPS at day 3 were superior compared to PVS at the end of the procedure to predict recurrent VT, especially in patients with ICM.
Authors
- Karin Nentwich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-5980)
- Artur Berkovitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-9668)
- Julian Müller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8793-3134)
- Sebastian Barth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9549-3503)
- Ivaylo Chakarov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-7283)
- Heiko Lehrmann
- Felix Ausbüttel
- Christian Wächter
- Thomas Deneke
Institutions
- Rhön-Klinikum (DE)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
- Nuremberg Hospital (DE)
- Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2024-08-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01883-y
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.80