Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of New Kabuli-Type Chickpea Lines in Australia for Resistance to Ascochyta Blight

Ascochyta blight (AB) is a major threat to Kabuli-type chickpea production worldwide. This study aimed to identify AB-resistant Kabuli-type chickpea lines through combined phenotypic and genotypic screening. Twenty-six Kabuli-type chickpea lines were phenotyped at the seedling stage using spray inoculation with conidial suspension. Genotyping employed marker-aided selection (MAS) with markers linked to quantitative trait loci (QTL) for AB resistance. The allele-specific marker, CaETR, closely linked to QTLAR1, and the sequence-tagged microsatellite (STMS) markers GAA47, TAA146, and TA194 linked to QTLAR1, QTLAR2, and QTLAR3 were used to assess their utility in distinguishing between resistant and susceptible chickpea lines. The study revealed that none of the lines tested were completely resistant (R) phenotypically. However, some lines, such as AVTCPK#6 and AVTCPK#14, were found to be moderately resistant (MR). Of the two MR lines identified phenotypically, only AVTCPK#6 was found to have bands linked to QTLs for adult plant resistance. The other MR line for AB showed the presence of bands in only one or two of the four markers used. These MR lines can be further utilized in chickpea breeding programs for the development of AB-resistant chickpea cultivars. It is recommended that these results be verified through repeat experiments, using more diverse isolates, and including additional chickpea lines as reference checks for resistance and susceptibility. The allele-specific marker, CaETR, closely linked to QTLAR1 and sequence-tagged microsatellite (STMS) markers GAA47, TAA146 and TA194 linked to QTLAR1, QTLAR2, and QTLAR3 were used to explore these markers’ utility in discriminating between resistant and susceptible chickpea lines. The study showed that phenotypically, none of the lines tested are completely resistant (R). However, some lines, namely AVTCPK#6 and AVTCPK#14, were found to be moderately resistant (MR). Of the two MR lines identified phenotypically, only AVTCPK#6 was identified to have bands linked to QTLs for adult plant resistance. The other MR line for AB showed the presence of bands in only one or two markers among the four markers used. These MR lines can be exploited further in chickpea breeding programs for the development of AB-resistant chickpea cultivars. It is recommended that these results are verified by repeat experiments, using more as well as diverse isolates alongside additional chickpea lines for resistant and susceptible reference checks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crops
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/crops4030028
Primary Topic
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of New Kabuli-Type Chickpea Lines in Australia for Resistance to Ascochyta Blight

Surya P. Bhattarai, Dante L. Adorada, Megha Subedi
Crops
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
article

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of New Kabuli-Type Chickpea Lines in Australia for Resistance to Ascochyta Blight

Surya P. Bhattarai, Dante L. Adorada, Megha Subedi
article en

Abstract

Ascochyta blight (AB) is a major threat to Kabuli-type chickpea production worldwide. This study aimed to identify AB-resistant Kabuli-type chickpea lines through combined phenotypic and genotypic screening. Twenty-six Kabuli-type chickpea lines were phenotyped at the seedling stage using spray inoculation with conidial suspension. Genotyping employed marker-aided selection (MAS) with markers linked to quantitative trait loci (QTL) for AB resistance. The allele-specific marker, CaETR, closely linked to QTLAR1, and the sequence-tagged microsatellite (STMS) markers GAA47, TAA146, and TA194 linked to QTLAR1, QTLAR2, and QTLAR3 were used to assess their utility in distinguishing between resistant and susceptible chickpea lines. The study revealed that none of the lines tested were completely resistant (R) phenotypically. However, some lines, such as AVTCPK#6 and AVTCPK#14, were found to be moderately resistant (MR). Of the two MR lines identified phenotypically, only AVTCPK#6 was found to have bands linked to QTLs for adult plant resistance. The other MR line for AB showed the presence of bands in only one or two of the four markers used. These MR lines can be further utilized in chickpea breeding programs for the development of AB-resistant chickpea cultivars. It is recommended that these results be verified through repeat experiments, using more diverse isolates, and including additional chickpea lines as reference checks for resistance and susceptibility. The allele-specific marker, CaETR, closely linked to QTLAR1 and sequence-tagged microsatellite (STMS) markers GAA47, TAA146 and TA194 linked to QTLAR1, QTLAR2, and QTLAR3 were used to explore these markers’ utility in discriminating between resistant and susceptible chickpea lines. The study showed that phenotypically, none of the lines tested are completely resistant (R). However, some lines, namely AVTCPK#6 and AVTCPK#14, were found to be moderately resistant (MR). Of the two MR lines identified phenotypically, only AVTCPK#6 was identified to have bands linked to QTLs for adult plant resistance. The other MR line for AB showed the presence of bands in only one or two markers among the four markers used. These MR lines can be exploited further in chickpea breeding programs for the development of AB-resistant chickpea cultivars. It is recommended that these results are verified by repeat experiments, using more as well as diverse isolates alongside additional chickpea lines for resistant and susceptible reference checks.

CropsVol. 4(3)
University of Southern Queensland (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Central Queensland University, University of Southern Queensland
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.