Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for Ocular Subjective Responses

This work provides MCID values which are important for interpreting ocular subjective responses and planning clinical studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.13.8.28
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for Ocular Subjective Responses

Maria Navascues‐Cornago, Sarah Guthrie, Philip B. Morgan, Jill Woods
7 citations
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
3.80
article

Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for Ocular Subjective Responses

Maria Navascues‐Cornago, Sarah Guthrie, Philip B. Morgan, Jill Woods
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This work provides MCID values which are important for interpreting ocular subjective responses and planning clinical studies.

Translational Vision Science & TechnologyVol. 13(8)
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Manchester (GB)
CooperVision
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
3.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.