The Politics of the Nation and the Limits of Immigrant Research

This paper explores how the "politics of the nation" shape migration research. Immigration research inherently intersects with the political dynamics of nation-states; however, beyond this fundamental framework, a myriad of political factors shape the agendas and methodologies of researchers seeking to enter these fields. This paper examines how these politics influence the questions asked and knowledge produced within the context of immigration research through vignettes drawn from fieldwork conducted during an era of heightened politicization and challenges for immigration institutions in the United States. It illustrates how the politics of the nation materialize in institutional contexts, when contentious politics constrain access to data, research spaces, or participants; curtail the openness of potential community partners; or erect barriers to certain types of academic inquiry. Ultimately, this paper calls for a critical examination of how political forces shape and constrain the practice of immigration research, as well as the epistemological costs. Keywords: immigrant institutions, fieldwork, refugee resettlement, immigrant research, politics, politicization

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geographical Review
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2024.2387822
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of the Nation and the Limits of Immigrant Research

Emily Frazier
2 citations
Geographical Review
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
2.26
article

The Politics of the Nation and the Limits of Immigrant Research

Emily Frazier
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper explores how the "politics of the nation" shape migration research. Immigration research inherently intersects with the political dynamics of nation-states; however, beyond this fundamental framework, a myriad of political factors shape the agendas and methodologies of researchers seeking to enter these fields. This paper examines how these politics influence the questions asked and knowledge produced within the context of immigration research through vignettes drawn from fieldwork conducted during an era of heightened politicization and challenges for immigration institutions in the United States. It illustrates how the politics of the nation materialize in institutional contexts, when contentious politics constrain access to data, research spaces, or participants; curtail the openness of potential community partners; or erect barriers to certain types of academic inquiry. Ultimately, this paper calls for a critical examination of how political forces shape and constrain the practice of immigration research, as well as the epistemological costs. Keywords: immigrant institutions, fieldwork, refugee resettlement, immigrant research, politics, politicization

Geographical ReviewVol. 114(5)
Twitter (United States) (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Russell Sage Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Politics of the Nation and the Limits of Immigrant Research — Emily Frazier · Geographical Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS