A matter of choice: a cross-sectional study examining the impact of the overturning of Roe v Wade on U.S. medical students’ perceptions and career decisions

<ns3:p> Background In June 2022, the <ns3:italic>Dobbs</ns3:italic> decision by the U.S. Supreme Court overturned federal abortion protections. In states with restrictive abortion laws such as Indiana, which also has the country’s largest medical school and the third worst maternal mortality rate, the impact of this ruling may be huge on the medical field. The purpose of this study was to analyze perceptions of medical students in Indiana in their third and fourth years of education after the <ns3:italic>Dobbs</ns3:italic> decision to assess if the state’s current abortion restrictions impact their career choice. Methods Between December 2022 and March 2023, an anonymous survey was carried out at Indiana University School of Medicine, which included questions about personal beliefs on abortion and the current abortion laws in Indiana, as well as priorities when choosing residency training and practice locations. Results Our survey found that four-fifths of medical students in Indiana disagreed with the <ns3:italic>Dobbs</ns3:italic> decision. While most students (71.4%) had not considered state abortion laws when selecting a medical school, since the Dobbs decision, 66.3% of third-year and 40.3% of fourth-year students indicated that they would take abortion laws into account when choosing a residency program. 47.5% of female students stated that they will be seeking residency in a state where abortion is legal and 55.3% of single students were more likely to leave Indiana to practice medicine. Conclusion Our research suggests that physicians who are more liberal in their views on abortion may now be much less likely to practice in conservative states which will compound the healthcare outcomes secondary to the Dobbs decision. We emphasize the role that abortion laws have in shaping the landscape of healthcare workforce and the need for a more nuanced understanding of how societal structures impact women's reproductive decisions and career paths in medicine. </ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MedEdPublish
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20519.1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A matter of choice: a cross-sectional study examining the impact of the overturning of Roe v Wade on U.S. medical students’ perceptions and career decisions

Zeb Saeed, Alissa Conklin, Sacha Sharp
MedEdPublish
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

A matter of choice: a cross-sectional study examining the impact of the overturning of Roe v Wade on U.S. medical students’ perceptions and career decisions

Zeb Saeed, Alissa Conklin, Sacha Sharp
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p> Background In June 2022, the <ns3:italic>Dobbs</ns3:italic> decision by the U.S. Supreme Court overturned federal abortion protections. In states with restrictive abortion laws such as Indiana, which also has the country’s largest medical school and the third worst maternal mortality rate, the impact of this ruling may be huge on the medical field. The purpose of this study was to analyze perceptions of medical students in Indiana in their third and fourth years of education after the <ns3:italic>Dobbs</ns3:italic> decision to assess if the state’s current abortion restrictions impact their career choice. Methods Between December 2022 and March 2023, an anonymous survey was carried out at Indiana University School of Medicine, which included questions about personal beliefs on abortion and the current abortion laws in Indiana, as well as priorities when choosing residency training and practice locations. Results Our survey found that four-fifths of medical students in Indiana disagreed with the <ns3:italic>Dobbs</ns3:italic> decision. While most students (71.4%) had not considered state abortion laws when selecting a medical school, since the Dobbs decision, 66.3% of third-year and 40.3% of fourth-year students indicated that they would take abortion laws into account when choosing a residency program. 47.5% of female students stated that they will be seeking residency in a state where abortion is legal and 55.3% of single students were more likely to leave Indiana to practice medicine. Conclusion Our research suggests that physicians who are more liberal in their views on abortion may now be much less likely to practice in conservative states which will compound the healthcare outcomes secondary to the Dobbs decision. We emphasize the role that abortion laws have in shaping the landscape of healthcare workforce and the need for a more nuanced understanding of how societal structures impact women's reproductive decisions and career paths in medicine. </ns3:p>

MedEdPublishVol. 14
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A matter of choice: a cross-sectional study examining the impact of the overturning of Roe v Wade on U.S. medical students’ perceptions and career decisions — Zeb Saeed, Alissa Conklin, et al. · MedEdPublish (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS