Do green innovation and governance limit CO2 emissions: evidence from twelve polluting countries with panel data decision tree model

We examine the effectiveness of green innovation on CO2 emissions in the top twelve polluting nations—China, the US, India, Russia, Japan, South Korea, Canada, Mexico, Turkey, Italy, Poland, and the UK—from 1996 to 2020. Using panel data fixed and random effect model and decision tree analysis, we found that industrialization, urbanization, and economic growth increase CO2 emissions, whereas green energy consumption and governance decrease CO2 emissions. In the panel data tree-based model, governance is in the second and third positions in the decision tree fixed, and random effect model. Green innovation is not statistically significant despite the expected negative sign. The findings suggest that policymakers should encourage investment in green energy production and governance to combat environmental degradation. Investment in green energy should be escalated to ensure energy efficiency in the long term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00418-9
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do green innovation and governance limit CO2 emissions: evidence from twelve polluting countries with panel data decision tree model

Bartosz Jóźwik, Siba Prasada Panda, Pritish Kumar Sahu, Aruna Kumar Dash
16 citations
Discover Sustainability
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
18.07
article

Do green innovation and governance limit CO2 emissions: evidence from twelve polluting countries with panel data decision tree model

Bartosz Jóźwik, Siba Prasada Panda, Pritish Kumar Sahu, Aruna Kumar Dash
article en
16 citations

Abstract

We examine the effectiveness of green innovation on CO2 emissions in the top twelve polluting nations—China, the US, India, Russia, Japan, South Korea, Canada, Mexico, Turkey, Italy, Poland, and the UK—from 1996 to 2020. Using panel data fixed and random effect model and decision tree analysis, we found that industrialization, urbanization, and economic growth increase CO2 emissions, whereas green energy consumption and governance decrease CO2 emissions. In the panel data tree-based model, governance is in the second and third positions in the decision tree fixed, and random effect model. Green innovation is not statistically significant despite the expected negative sign. The findings suggest that policymakers should encourage investment in green energy production and governance to combat environmental degradation. Investment in green energy should be escalated to ensure energy efficiency in the long term.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 5(1)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL), International Management Institute (IN), Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (IN), Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts of India (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
18.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do green innovation and governance limit CO2 emissions: evidence from twelve polluting countries with panel data decision tree model — Bartosz Jóźwik, Siba Prasada Panda, et al. · Discover Sustainability (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS