Trust Not Verify? The Critical Need for Data Curation Standards in Materials Informatics

The importance of data curation has been recognized in multiple areas of research; however, the discussion of this important issue is only beginning to emerge in materials science. In this Perspective, we highlight the benefits of using the standardized data curation protocols in materials science and discuss current gaps in accurate and reproducible data reporting using case studies drawn from high-impact materials science papers and well-known databases such as the Crystallography Open Database (COD) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). We argue that both experimental and computational materials scientists need to embrace a culture of rigorous data curation as part of modern research data management. We propose a sample data curation pipeline for materials chemistry and illustrate its use by creating two new materials chemistry databases. We hope that this perspective will serve to catalyze further discussion and promote the continuous development of rigorous data curation practices within the materials science research community. We posit that adherence to best practices of data curation will promote and enhance the reliability, reproducibility, and integrity of materials research and enable the development of reliable AI and machine learning models that critically depend on the use of quality data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00981
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust Not Verify? The Critical Need for Data Curation Standards in Materials Informatics

James F. Cahoon, Eugene Muratov, Vinícius M. Alves, Matthew Hart et al.
11 citations
Chemistry of Materials
Research Data Management Practices
8.57
article

Trust Not Verify? The Critical Need for Data Curation Standards in Materials Informatics

James F. Cahoon, Eugene Muratov, Vinícius M. Alves, Matthew Hart, Chun‐Hsing Chen, Alexander J. M. Miller, David A. Winkler, Alexander Tropsha, Kelvin Idanwekhai, Jillian L. Dempsey
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The importance of data curation has been recognized in multiple areas of research; however, the discussion of this important issue is only beginning to emerge in materials science. In this Perspective, we highlight the benefits of using the standardized data curation protocols in materials science and discuss current gaps in accurate and reproducible data reporting using case studies drawn from high-impact materials science papers and well-known databases such as the Crystallography Open Database (COD) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). We argue that both experimental and computational materials scientists need to embrace a culture of rigorous data curation as part of modern research data management. We propose a sample data curation pipeline for materials chemistry and illustrate its use by creating two new materials chemistry databases. We hope that this perspective will serve to catalyze further discussion and promote the continuous development of rigorous data curation practices within the materials science research community. We posit that adherence to best practices of data curation will promote and enhance the reliability, reproducibility, and integrity of materials research and enable the development of reliable AI and machine learning models that critically depend on the use of quality data.

Chemistry of MaterialsVol. 36(19)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Nottingham (GB), La Trobe University (AU), Applied Physical Sciences (United States) (US), Monash University (AU)
Division of Mathematical Sciences, Basic Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Research Data Management Practices
8.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.