“[It's the] first time I have felt so acutely that I am 'less' because of my age.”: Aging in the time of COVID-19

• Public discourse describing COVID-19 susceptibility was focused in terms of age. • Inductive analysis revealed age-related overgeneralizations and benevolent ageism. • Age-based framing perpetuated ‘othering’ between and within generations. • Public health messaging must consider intergenerational conflict frames. Initially, many of the measures implemented to promote public health and stop the spread of COVID-19 explicitly targeted older adults. Public discourse, media coverage, and government policy at the beginning stages of the COVID-19 pandemic perpetuated views that older adults are frail, vulnerable, and dispensable. Understanding how the framing of pandemics impacts older adults’ experiences can inform strategies to reduce ageism in the future. Participants completed an online survey that captured their experiences during COVID-19. At the end of the survey, we asked participants, “What else would you like to share about your experience of living through COVID-19?” One thousand forty-six individuals responded to this open-ended question across all three survey waves with 1700 comments included in the analysis. We conducted an inductive descriptive analysis. The inductive analysis revealed broader implications of age-related overgeneralizations and benevolent ageism. Three implications of public health messaging were identified: intergenerational conflict, age-based vulnerability, and distrust of leadership and information. The results highlight that age-based public health messaging leads to feelings and experiences of prejudice and increases generational divides. The coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic and the open discourse around vulnerability when contracting COVID-19 was framed in terms of age. Experiences with age-based framing perpetuate ‘othering’ between generations and even within generations. Public health messaging and decision-makers must consider intergenerational conflict frames before instituting social policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aging and Health Research
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahr.2024.100203
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“[It's the] first time I have felt so acutely that I am 'less' because of my age.”: Aging in the time of COVID-19

Allie Peckham, M. Aaron Guest, Molly Maxfield
3 citations
Aging and Health Research
Aging and Gerontology Research
3.08
article

“[It's the] first time I have felt so acutely that I am 'less' because of my age.”: Aging in the time of COVID-19

Allie Peckham, M. Aaron Guest, Molly Maxfield
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Public discourse describing COVID-19 susceptibility was focused in terms of age. • Inductive analysis revealed age-related overgeneralizations and benevolent ageism. • Age-based framing perpetuated ‘othering’ between and within generations. • Public health messaging must consider intergenerational conflict frames. Initially, many of the measures implemented to promote public health and stop the spread of COVID-19 explicitly targeted older adults. Public discourse, media coverage, and government policy at the beginning stages of the COVID-19 pandemic perpetuated views that older adults are frail, vulnerable, and dispensable. Understanding how the framing of pandemics impacts older adults’ experiences can inform strategies to reduce ageism in the future. Participants completed an online survey that captured their experiences during COVID-19. At the end of the survey, we asked participants, “What else would you like to share about your experience of living through COVID-19?” One thousand forty-six individuals responded to this open-ended question across all three survey waves with 1700 comments included in the analysis. We conducted an inductive descriptive analysis. The inductive analysis revealed broader implications of age-related overgeneralizations and benevolent ageism. Three implications of public health messaging were identified: intergenerational conflict, age-based vulnerability, and distrust of leadership and information. The results highlight that age-based public health messaging leads to feelings and experiences of prejudice and increases generational divides. The coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic and the open discourse around vulnerability when contracting COVID-19 was framed in terms of age. Experiences with age-based framing perpetuate ‘othering’ between generations and even within generations. Public health messaging and decision-makers must consider intergenerational conflict frames before instituting social policies.

Aging and Health ResearchVol. 4(3)
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (BE), Center for Innovation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Aging and Gerontology Research
3.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.