Numerical parametric study on the impact of non-continuous longitudinal stiffening

In non-continuous stiffening, longitudinal stiffeners end within the panel, creating gaps before reaching transverse stiffeners or girder ends. This numerical parametric study examines a validated model subjected to uniform compression for ten imperfection patterns across 1080 geometric configurations, resulting in 10,800 GMNIAs. Findings refute the redundancy of imperfections due to eccentric loads and identify critical imperfection patterns. Stiffener stiffness minimally impacts ultimate loads. More stiffeners lower ultimate loads by restricting stress redistribution. Minimizing gap dimensions is recommended for optimal performance, indicating the need to update standards to include non-continuous stiffening. • Positive half-sin shape imperfections are critical; full-sin shapes for long panels. • Smaller gaps yield higher loads; stiffener’s relative stiffness has low impact. • More stiffeners reduce load factor; fewer stiffeners improve stress redistribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108966
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical parametric study on the impact of non-continuous longitudinal stiffening

Robert E. Lang, Ralph Timmers, Immo Lukas
6 citations
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
1.28
article

Numerical parametric study on the impact of non-continuous longitudinal stiffening

Robert E. Lang, Ralph Timmers, Immo Lukas
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In non-continuous stiffening, longitudinal stiffeners end within the panel, creating gaps before reaching transverse stiffeners or girder ends. This numerical parametric study examines a validated model subjected to uniform compression for ten imperfection patterns across 1080 geometric configurations, resulting in 10,800 GMNIAs. Findings refute the redundancy of imperfections due to eccentric loads and identify critical imperfection patterns. Stiffener stiffness minimally impacts ultimate loads. More stiffeners lower ultimate loads by restricting stress redistribution. Minimizing gap dimensions is recommended for optimal performance, indicating the need to update standards to include non-continuous stiffening. • Positive half-sin shape imperfections are critical; full-sin shapes for long panels. • Smaller gaps yield higher loads; stiffener’s relative stiffness has low impact. • More stiffeners reduce load factor; fewer stiffeners improve stress redistribution.

Journal of Constructional Steel ResearchVol. 222
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numerical parametric study on the impact of non-continuous longitudinal stiffening — Robert E. Lang, Ralph Timmers, et al. · Journal of Constructional Steel Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS