“A small step forward can be as important as a big one” – Parliamentary debate about the first abortion law in Sweden in 1938

“A small step forward can be as important as a big one”. So says the social democrat Agda Östlund in the Second Chamber of the Swedish Parliament on Wednesday May 18, 1938, when she justifies her support for a new abortion law.[1] The law gives the right to abortion for women with faltering health and many children, but not for those who suffer financial hardship or social disgrace after becoming pregnant out of wedlock. The debate, and the bill, is characterized by a spirit of cooperation and willingness to compromise. An exception is the conflict between the female members. Voting takes place by standing up and only a few votes against the bill. Previous research has not considered class as central to this debate. However, as we shall see, the debate is about the working-class woman. [1] Andra kammaren 1938:35, Ang. förslag till lag om avbrytande av havandeskap, p. 27.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Working-Class Studies
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13001/jwcs.v9i1.8895
Primary Topic
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“A small step forward can be as important as a big one” – Parliamentary debate about the first abortion law in Sweden in 1938

Magnus Gustafson
Journal of Working-Class Studies
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
article

“A small step forward can be as important as a big one” – Parliamentary debate about the first abortion law in Sweden in 1938

Magnus Gustafson
article en

Abstract

“A small step forward can be as important as a big one”. So says the social democrat Agda Östlund in the Second Chamber of the Swedish Parliament on Wednesday May 18, 1938, when she justifies her support for a new abortion law.[1] The law gives the right to abortion for women with faltering health and many children, but not for those who suffer financial hardship or social disgrace after becoming pregnant out of wedlock. The debate, and the bill, is characterized by a spirit of cooperation and willingness to compromise. An exception is the conflict between the female members. Voting takes place by standing up and only a few votes against the bill. Previous research has not considered class as central to this debate. However, as we shall see, the debate is about the working-class woman. [1] Andra kammaren 1938:35, Ang. förslag till lag om avbrytande av havandeskap, p. 27.

Journal of Working-Class StudiesVol. 9(1)
Malmö University (SE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.