Constraining modified gravity with weak-lensing peaks

ABSTRACT It is well established that maximizing the information extracted from upcoming and ongoing stage-IV weak-lensing surveys requires higher order summary statistics that complement the standard two-point statistics. In this work, we focus on weak-lensing peak statistics to test two popular modified gravity models, $f(R)$ and nDGP, using the forge and bridge weak-lensing simulations, respectively. From these simulations, we measure the peak statistics as a function of both cosmological and modified gravity parameters simultaneously. Our findings indicate that the peak abundance is sensitive to the strength of modified gravity, while the peak two-point correlation function is sensitive to the nature of the screening mechanism in a modified gravity model. We combine these simulated statistics with a Gaussian Process Regression emulator and a Gaussian likelihood to generate stage-IV forecast posterior distributions for the modified gravity models. We demonstrate that, assuming small scales can be correctly modelled, peak statistics can be used to distinguish general relativity from $f(R)$ and nDGP models at the 2σ level with a stage-IV survey area of $300$ and $1000 \, \rm {deg}^2$, respectively. Finally, we show that peak statistics can constrain $\log _{10}\left(|f_{R0}|\right) = -6$ per cent to 2 per cent precision, and $\log _{10}(H_0 r_c) = 0.5$ per cent to 25 per cent precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1966
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraining modified gravity with weak-lensing peaks

Baojiu Li, César Hernández‐Aguayo, Benjamin Giblin, Christopher T Davies et al.
11 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
3.65
article

Constraining modified gravity with weak-lensing peaks

Baojiu Li, César Hernández‐Aguayo, Benjamin Giblin, Christopher T Davies, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, E. Paillas
article en
11 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is well established that maximizing the information extracted from upcoming and ongoing stage-IV weak-lensing surveys requires higher order summary statistics that complement the standard two-point statistics. In this work, we focus on weak-lensing peak statistics to test two popular modified gravity models, $f(R)$ and nDGP, using the forge and bridge weak-lensing simulations, respectively. From these simulations, we measure the peak statistics as a function of both cosmological and modified gravity parameters simultaneously. Our findings indicate that the peak abundance is sensitive to the strength of modified gravity, while the peak two-point correlation function is sensitive to the nature of the screening mechanism in a modified gravity model. We combine these simulated statistics with a Gaussian Process Regression emulator and a Gaussian likelihood to generate stage-IV forecast posterior distributions for the modified gravity models. We demonstrate that, assuming small scales can be correctly modelled, peak statistics can be used to distinguish general relativity from $f(R)$ and nDGP models at the 2σ level with a stage-IV survey area of $300$ and $1000 \, \rm {deg}^2$, respectively. Finally, we show that peak statistics can constrain $\log _{10}\left(|f_{R0}|\right) = -6$ per cent to 2 per cent precision, and $\log _{10}(H_0 r_c) = 0.5$ per cent to 25 per cent precision.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 533(3)
University of Waterloo (CA), Durham University (GB), Excellence Cluster Origins (DE), Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE), Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Newcastle University (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
California Department of Fish and Game, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.