Comparative analysis of microplastics detection methods applied to marine sediments: A case study in the Bay of Marseille

An intercomparison exercise on "microplastics in sediment" was carried out by five laboratories using samples collected in the Bay of Marseille in September 2021. The results from different extraction and identification methods varied depending on the type and size classes of MPs, and was better than 80 % for the size class >300 μm and for the fragments. The variability in recovery rates can be attributed to the choice of reagents and extraction protocols. Recovery rates per laboratory were between 47 % and 113 % and the use of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> and NaI increased recovery rates by an average of 70 %. The lowest recovery rates (47 and 53 %) were attributed to the reference methods (FTIR and LDIR), conversely the highest (80 and 87 %) were attributed to identification by Nile Red. The average ranged between 23 and 53 items /50 g d.w. with decreases offshore and at greater depth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116787
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of microplastics detection methods applied to marine sediments: A case study in the Bay of Marseille

Bavo De Witte, François Galgani, David Vanavermaete, Gustavo Blanco et al.
11 citations
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.46
article

Comparative analysis of microplastics detection methods applied to marine sediments: A case study in the Bay of Marseille

Bavo De Witte, François Galgani, David Vanavermaete, Gustavo Blanco, Mélanie Ourgaud, Laure Papillon, Elise Georges, Olivia Gérigny, Richard Sempéré, Urmas Lips, Natalja Buhhalko, Nelle Meyers, Leelou Chouteau
article en
11 citations

Abstract

An intercomparison exercise on "microplastics in sediment" was carried out by five laboratories using samples collected in the Bay of Marseille in September 2021. The results from different extraction and identification methods varied depending on the type and size classes of MPs, and was better than 80 % for the size class >300 μm and for the fragments. The variability in recovery rates can be attributed to the choice of reagents and extraction protocols. Recovery rates per laboratory were between 47 % and 113 % and the use of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> and NaI increased recovery rates by an average of 70 %. The lowest recovery rates (47 and 53 %) were attributed to the reference methods (FTIR and LDIR), conversely the highest (80 and 87 %) were attributed to identification by Nile Red. The average ranged between 23 and 53 items /50 g d.w. with decreases offshore and at greater depth.

Marine Pollution BulletinVol. 207
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), Flanders Marine Institute (BE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Ifremer (FR), Ghent University (BE), Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES), Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens (FR), Institut Méditerranéen d’Océanologie (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, Ministry of Education, India
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.