Anatomy of a post-wildfire recovery: Responses of mammals to a Black Summer wildfire in a fox-free landscape

Wildfires are predicted to increase in frequency and severity with climate change. Devising effective strategies to ensure wildfires do not hasten a decline in wildlife populations hinges on developing a deeper understanding of how species are affected by recent wildfires. I investigated the response of eight species of medium-sized mammals over a 4-year period (2020–2023) following a wildfire in the Australian Black Summer fire season. Pre-wildfire population levels were not known. These species differed in their ability to survive the passage of fire; from being able to flee the fire front, to remaining in protective shelters, to favouring unburnt forest types, to none of these strategies. Camera trapping was conducted from 5 months to 4 years after the fire across 62 sites in wet and dry sclerophyll forest (burnt and unburnt) and rainforest (unburnt) to characterise both initial survival and subsequent reproduction-led post-fire occupancy. There was consistency in the response of species in year 1. Those assumed to be able to flee the fires showed medium-high post-fire occupancy regardless of whether a site was burnt. Those that use protective shelters and unburnt forest also showed high occupancy. One species without these options showed greatly reduced occupancy in year 1 relative to years 3 and 4. Most species showed evidence of increased detection across years, which is inferred to reflect increased abundance, and was expected given substantially above average rainfall for three years following the fire. The feral cat was the only predator sufficiently widespread to be of concern in species’ recovery but was rarely detected in years 1 and 2, relative to years 3 and 4. This study provides evidence that many species, including three threatened species, have the ability to survive the passage of fire, and show high post-fire occupancy. The study landscape contained abundant habitat elements (unburnt rainforest, boulder fields) that promote survival through a wildfire and post-fire recovery, providing insights to guide future conservation actions. • Knowledge of wildlife responses to wildfires can guide future forest management. • Ecological traits may influence survival through a fire and the speed of recovery. • Eight mammal species were studied in detail after a wildfire in eastern Australia. • Survival was high in species predicted to flee or remain in protective shelters. • Habitat elements (unburnt rainforest, boulder fields) may have promoted survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122205
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anatomy of a post-wildfire recovery: Responses of mammals to a Black Summer wildfire in a fox-free landscape

Ross L. Goldingay
5 citations
Forest Ecology and Management
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.41
article

Anatomy of a post-wildfire recovery: Responses of mammals to a Black Summer wildfire in a fox-free landscape

Ross L. Goldingay
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Wildfires are predicted to increase in frequency and severity with climate change. Devising effective strategies to ensure wildfires do not hasten a decline in wildlife populations hinges on developing a deeper understanding of how species are affected by recent wildfires. I investigated the response of eight species of medium-sized mammals over a 4-year period (2020–2023) following a wildfire in the Australian Black Summer fire season. Pre-wildfire population levels were not known. These species differed in their ability to survive the passage of fire; from being able to flee the fire front, to remaining in protective shelters, to favouring unburnt forest types, to none of these strategies. Camera trapping was conducted from 5 months to 4 years after the fire across 62 sites in wet and dry sclerophyll forest (burnt and unburnt) and rainforest (unburnt) to characterise both initial survival and subsequent reproduction-led post-fire occupancy. There was consistency in the response of species in year 1. Those assumed to be able to flee the fires showed medium-high post-fire occupancy regardless of whether a site was burnt. Those that use protective shelters and unburnt forest also showed high occupancy. One species without these options showed greatly reduced occupancy in year 1 relative to years 3 and 4. Most species showed evidence of increased detection across years, which is inferred to reflect increased abundance, and was expected given substantially above average rainfall for three years following the fire. The feral cat was the only predator sufficiently widespread to be of concern in species’ recovery but was rarely detected in years 1 and 2, relative to years 3 and 4. This study provides evidence that many species, including three threatened species, have the ability to survive the passage of fire, and show high post-fire occupancy. The study landscape contained abundant habitat elements (unburnt rainforest, boulder fields) that promote survival through a wildfire and post-fire recovery, providing insights to guide future conservation actions. • Knowledge of wildlife responses to wildfires can guide future forest management. • Ecological traits may influence survival through a fire and the speed of recovery. • Eight mammal species were studied in detail after a wildfire in eastern Australia. • Survival was high in species predicted to flee or remain in protective shelters. • Habitat elements (unburnt rainforest, boulder fields) may have promoted survival.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 569
Southern Cross University (AU)
Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Australian Government, National Parks and Wildlife Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.