Development and validation of ARSAC-CORTH coupling code based on a generic coupling architecture

Reactor thermal-hydraulic codes can be categorized into system codes, sub-channel codes and CFD (computational fluid dynamics) codes according to the spatial discretization and simplification methods. As a traditional reactor system safety analysis code, system code is able to analyze the overall performance of the reactor quickly, while it cannot capture the mixing effects between coolant channels in the core accurately. The sub-channel code is currently the most suitable code for core analysis, with higher fidelity than system code and less computation resources than CFD code. To perform analysis of coupling effects between thermal-hydraulics characteristics of the reactor system and those of core, the in-house system code ASRAC and the in-house sub-channel code CORTH are coupled based on a generic coupling architecture. This generic coupling architecture comprises the generic coupling interface concept ICoCo (Interface for Code Coupling) and the generic data exchange model MED (Model for Exchanging field Data). In order to evaluate the accuracy and capability of the coupling code, the LOFT experiment case is chosen and analyzed. According to the validation results, compared with ASRAC code standalone, the ARSAC-CORTH coupling code is able to better analyze the coupling effects of loop system and core, meanwhile capturing the coolant mixing between coolant channels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Energy Research
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1400805
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of ARSAC-CORTH coupling code based on a generic coupling architecture

Xiaoyu Wang, Jian Deng, Zhifang Qiu, Luguo Liu et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Energy Research
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
1.30
article

Development and validation of ARSAC-CORTH coupling code based on a generic coupling architecture

Xiaoyu Wang, Jian Deng, Zhifang Qiu, Luguo Liu, Xilin Zhang, Mingjun Wang, Yunfeng Xia, Shinian Peng, Wei Zeng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reactor thermal-hydraulic codes can be categorized into system codes, sub-channel codes and CFD (computational fluid dynamics) codes according to the spatial discretization and simplification methods. As a traditional reactor system safety analysis code, system code is able to analyze the overall performance of the reactor quickly, while it cannot capture the mixing effects between coolant channels in the core accurately. The sub-channel code is currently the most suitable code for core analysis, with higher fidelity than system code and less computation resources than CFD code. To perform analysis of coupling effects between thermal-hydraulics characteristics of the reactor system and those of core, the in-house system code ASRAC and the in-house sub-channel code CORTH are coupled based on a generic coupling architecture. This generic coupling architecture comprises the generic coupling interface concept ICoCo (Interface for Code Coupling) and the generic data exchange model MED (Model for Exchanging field Data). In order to evaluate the accuracy and capability of the coupling code, the LOFT experiment case is chosen and analyzed. According to the validation results, compared with ASRAC code standalone, the ARSAC-CORTH coupling code is able to better analyze the coupling effects of loop system and core, meanwhile capturing the coolant mixing between coolant channels.

Frontiers in Energy ResearchVol. 12
China General Nuclear Power Corporation (China) (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.