Wat nu, als de openbare school niet meer zou bestaan?

What if the state school no longer existed? The Netherlands is well known by its system of funded state and non-state schools. The freedom of civilians to found their own (religious) non-state schools is in theory ‘backed’ by a network of state schools, that are generally accessible and neutral in their education. Parents who can’t register their child on a non-state school, because of its restrictive access policy on religious grounds, or don’t want their child to go to it, always have the alternative of choosing a state school. But this delicate constitutional balance doesn’t exist anymore. Over the years state schools have been privatized, governed as they are now by private law foundations without sufficient guarantees for their state character. On a lot of issues, such as: accessibility, neutral character, legal position of the personnel and curriculum, state schools don’t differ from the vast majority of non-state schools anymore. What does this situation of a presence of, in actuality, only non-state schools mean for our concept of freedom of education? In general, government has to keep more distance to the system than it does now. As a consequence the arguments of non-state schools to select pupils at the gate become weaker. Also the principle of offering religious education on state schools is on the way.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/tvrrb/187977842024015002004
Primary Topic
Religious Education and Schools
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wat nu, als de openbare school niet meer zou bestaan?

Paul Zoontjens
Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid
Religious Education and Schools
article

Wat nu, als de openbare school niet meer zou bestaan?

Paul Zoontjens
article en

Abstract

What if the state school no longer existed? The Netherlands is well known by its system of funded state and non-state schools. The freedom of civilians to found their own (religious) non-state schools is in theory ‘backed’ by a network of state schools, that are generally accessible and neutral in their education. Parents who can’t register their child on a non-state school, because of its restrictive access policy on religious grounds, or don’t want their child to go to it, always have the alternative of choosing a state school. But this delicate constitutional balance doesn’t exist anymore. Over the years state schools have been privatized, governed as they are now by private law foundations without sufficient guarantees for their state character. On a lot of issues, such as: accessibility, neutral character, legal position of the personnel and curriculum, state schools don’t differ from the vast majority of non-state schools anymore. What does this situation of a presence of, in actuality, only non-state schools mean for our concept of freedom of education? In general, government has to keep more distance to the system than it does now. As a consequence the arguments of non-state schools to select pupils at the gate become weaker. Also the principle of offering religious education on state schools is on the way.

Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en BeleidVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Religious Education and Schools
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.